ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023
Tregs defects caused delayed hypersensitivity reactions to multiple disinfectants following with debridement: A case report and literature review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceFollowing debridement, the skin and mucous membranes around the wound must be disinfected with broad-spectrum disinfectants like Iodophor, 75 % ethanol, chlorhexidine, and bromogeramine. Despite the fact that it is rarely reported, skin allergy to disinfectants is extremely detrimental to wound recovery after debridement. CASE PRESENTATION: In this study, a 29-year-old man with no previous allergic history developed delayed contact dermatitis after being exposed to multiple disinfectants, including iodophor, 75 % ethanol, and Erythromycin ointment. Given the possibility of the patient's allergic constitution, skin patch tests were repeated to confirm the allergic disinfectants. To avoid the allergy, the wound was simply rinsed with 0.9 % sodium chloride solution and Cefdinir (0.1 g, tid) was taken orally, while all local disinfectants were discontinued. The wound healing process was gradually accelerated, and allergic symptoms were alleviated. Furthermore, our findings revealed that the frequency and immunosuppressive function of Tregs were significantly lower in patients than in healthy controls (P < 0.05). CLINICAL DISCUSSION: By minimizing allergic reactions and providing appropriate wound care, the use of 0.9 % sodium chloride solution with oral antibiotics could expedite the healing process. This enabled the wound to close faster and reduces the risk of complications.
conclusionThe use of 0.9 % sodium chloride solution for wound irrigation, combined with oral administration of antibiotics, could be modified to mitigate further allergic reactions and enhance the recovery process following debridement. However, individual patient characteristics and medical history should also be taken into consideration when making these alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.