ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023
Workload assessment: cross-cultural adaptation, content validity and instrument reliability.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Mental Fatigue Magnitude Generates Greater Impaired Resistance Exercise Performance Than Moderate Mental Fatigue Magnitude in Trained Adults.European journal of sport science · 2026Trial
- Intraoperative nursing workload and associated factors: a cross-sectional analysis from two Brazilian hospital surgical units.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Workload in the Surgical Center: perceptions, activities and time spent by nurses.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto adapt, validate the content and assess the reliability of the instrument National Aeronautics and Space Administration - Task Load Index, translated into Brazilian Portuguese.
methodsa methodological study, divided into five steps: translation; synthesis; back-translation; assessment of the Portuguese version by an expert committee; pre-test and content validity of the final version by health professionals working in inpatient units. The Content Validity Index (CVI) (minimum 0.80) and Cronbach's alpha (minimum 0.70) were calculated.
resultsin the first round, in the agreement analysis of the translated version, three items did not reach the minimum CVI value. It was decided to remove the statement. The instrument title and items "performance" and "effort" were changed. There was consensus and approval of the final version in the pre-test step.
conclusionsthe NASA Task Load Index instrument, adapted to Brazilian Portuguese, presents reliability and content validity evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.