Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37556691›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023

King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Questionnaire: reliability and convergent construct validity.

Ana Carolina Sartori, Fânia Cristina Dos Santos, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Vinicius Batista Santos, Meiry Fernanda Pinto Okuno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Carolina SartoriUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-8775
Fânia Cristina Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2689-3532
Juliana de Lima LopesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-6781
Vinicius Batista SantosUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5130-5523
Meiry Fernanda Pinto OkunoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-1186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto assess the evidence of reliability and convergent construct validity of the King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Questionnaire.

methodspsychometric study of 75 older adults with Parkinson's disease. The instrument was applied by two researchers separately and reapplied by one researcher 15 days later. In terms of reliability, internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha test and stability using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Scores of the King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Questionnaire were compared to those of the Geriatric Pain Measure in the assessment of construct validity.

resultsthe mean Cronbach's alpha obtained between the three assessments was above 0.60, the intraclass correlation between the three assessments was above 0.90, and there was a weak but significant correlation between the two applied scales.

conclusionsthe instrument showed adequate evidence of convergent construct validity and reliability, and can be used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseAgedHumansPainPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37556691
PMCPMC10405386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.