ArticleCancer research2023
Allosteric Regulation of Switch-II Domain Controls KRAS Oncogenicity.
Article in Cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting KRASFrontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- RinPy, a Python Package for Residue Interaction Network Model to Analyze Protein Structures and Predict Ligand Binding Sites.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Overcoming Daraxonrasib Resistance: Allele-Specific Mechanisms Guide Salvage Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Disulfide tethering reveals cryptic pockets in oncogenic KRAS.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Cardiac Troponin I Promotes the Development of NSCLC Cells Through the Expression of Notch and Kras Proteins.Iranian journal of biotechnology · 2025Article
- Deciphering allosteric mechanisms in KRAS activation: insights from GTP-induced conformational dynamics and interaction network reorganization.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Characterization of the KRas G12D-inhibitor interactions by differential HDX-MS and molecular dynamics simulations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Comprehensive structure-function analysis reveals gain- and loss-of-function mechanisms impacting oncogenic KRAS activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- RAS G-domains allosterically contribute to the recognition of lipid headgroups and acyl chains.The Journal of cell biology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of KRAS4a and KRAS4b splice variants reveals distinctive structural and functional properties.Science advances · 2024Article
- Studying early structural changes in SOS1 mediated KRAS activation mechanism.Current research in structural biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RAS proteins are GTPases that regulate a wide range of cellular processes. RAS activity is dependent on its nucleotide-binding status, which is modulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAP). KRAS can be acetylated at lysine 104 (K104), and an acetylation-mimetic mutation of K104 to glutamine (K104Q) attenuates the in vitro-transforming capacity of oncogenic KRAS by interrupting GEF-induced nucleotide exchange. To assess the effect of this mutation in vivo, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to generate mouse models carrying the K104Q point mutation in wild-type and conditional KrasLSL-G12D alleles. Homozygous animals for K104Q were viable, fertile, and arose at the expected Mendelian frequency, indicating that K104Q is not a complete loss-of-function mutation. Consistent with our previous findings from in vitro studies, however, the oncogenic activity of KRASG12D was significantly attenuated by mutation at K104. Biochemical and structural analysis indicated that the G12D and K104Q mutations cooperate to suppress GEF-mediated nucleotide exchange, explaining the preferential effect of K104Q on oncogenic KRAS. Furthermore, K104 functioned in an allosteric network with M72, R73, and G75 on the α2 helix of the switch-II region. Intriguingly, point mutation of glycine 75 to alanine (G75A) also showed a strong negative regulatory effect on KRASG12D. These data demonstrate that lysine at position 104 is critical for the full oncogenic activity of mutant KRAS and suggest that modulating the sites in its allosteric network may provide a unique therapeutic approach in cancers expressing mutant KRAS. SIGNIFICANCE: An allosteric network formed by interaction between lysine 104 and residues in the switch-II domain is required for KRAS oncogenicity, which could be exploited for developing inhibitors of the activated oncoprotein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.