Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37556413›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Rotavirus vaccine product switch in Ghana: An assessment of service delivery costs, switching costs, and cost-effectiveness.

Richmond Owusu, Mercy Mvundura, Justice Nonvignon, George Armah, John Bawa, Kwadwo Odei Antwi-Agyei, Kwame Amponsa-Achiano, Frederick Dadzie, George Bonsu, Andrew Clark and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Richmond OwusuSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Mercy MvunduraCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7711-9558
Justice NonvignonSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7484-9491
George ArmahNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
John BawaCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Accra, Ghana.
Kwadwo Odei Antwi-AgyeiCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Accra, Ghana.
Kwame Amponsa-AchianoExpanded Programme on Immunization, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Frederick DadzieExpanded Programme on Immunization, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
George BonsuExpanded Programme on Immunization, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Andrew ClarkDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Clint PecenkaCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Frederic DebellutCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3027-2838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ghana introduced rotavirus vaccine (ROTARIX 1-dose presentation) into the routine national immunization program in 2012 and switched to a different product (ROTAVAC 5-dose presentation) in 2020. ROTAVAC has a lower price per dose (US$0.85 versus US$2.15 for ROTARIX) and smaller cold chain footprint but requires more doses per regimen (three versus two). This study estimates the supply chain and service delivery costs associated with each product, the costs involved in switching products, and compares the cost-effectiveness of both products over the next ten years. We estimated the supply chain and service delivery costs associated with ROTARIX and ROTAVAC (evaluating both the 5-dose and 10-dose presentations) using primary data collected from health facilities in six of the 14 regions in the country. We estimated the costs of switching from ROTARIX to ROTAVAC using information collected from key informant interviews and financial records provided by the government. All costs were reported in 2020 US$. We used the UNIVAC decision-support model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (US$ per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted from government and societal perspectives) of ROTARIX and ROTAVAC (5-dose or 10-dose presentations) compared to no vaccination, and to each other, over a ten-year period (2020 to 2029). We ran probabilistic sensitivity analyses and other threshold analyses. The supply chain and service delivery economic cost per dose was $2.40 for ROTARIX, $1.81 for ROTAVAC 5-dose, and $1.76 for ROTAVAC 10-dose. The financial and economic cost of switching from ROTARIX to ROTAVAC 5-dose was $453,070 and $883,626, respectively. Compared to no vaccination, the cost per DALY averted was $360 for ROTARIX, $298 for ROTAVAC 5-dose, and $273 for ROTAVAC 10-dose. ROTAVAC 10-dose was the most cost-effective option and would be cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds exceeding 0.12 times the national GDP per capita ($2,206 in the year 2020). The switch from ROTARIX to ROTAVAC 5-dose in 2020 was cost-saving. Rotavirus vaccination is highly cost-effective in Ghana. A switch from ROTAVAC 5-dose to ROTAVAC 10-dose would be cost-saving and should be considered.

Identifiers

PMID37556413
PMCPMC10411789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.