Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37556181›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Using Presurgical Biopsychosocial Features to Develop an Advanced Clinical Decision-Making Support Tool for Predicting Recovery Trajectories in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.

Karen Ribbons, Sarah Johnson, Elizabeth Ditton, Adrian Wills, Gillian Mason, Traci Flynn, Jodie Cochrane, Michael Pollack, Frederick Rohan Walker, Michael Nilsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen RibbonsCentre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-9492
Sarah JohnsonCentre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-3013
Elizabeth DittonCentre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4007-0989
Adrian WillsCentre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8556-6649
Gillian MasonHunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4060-3132
Traci FlynnCollege of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5264-8747
Jodie CochraneCentre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8259-0478
Michael Pollack *Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-0934
Frederick Rohan Walker *Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-0761
Michael Nilsson *Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8826-1621
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AUNanyang Technological University · SGUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10% to 20% of patients report dissatisfaction with procedural outcomes. There is growing recognition that postsurgical satisfaction is shaped not only by the quality of surgery but also by psychological and social factors. Surprisingly, information on the psychological and social determinants of surgical outcomes is rarely collected before surgery. A comprehensive collection of biopsychosocial information could assist clinicians in making recommendations in relation to rehabilitation, particularly if there is robust evidence to support the ability of presurgical constructs to predict postsurgical outcomes. Clinical decision support tools can help identify factors influencing patient outcomes and support the provision of interventions or services that can be tailored to meet individuals' needs. However, despite their potential clinical benefit, the application of such tools remains limited.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a clinical decision tool that will assist with patient stratification and more precisely targeted clinical decision-making regarding prehabilitation and rehabilitation for TKA, based on the identified individual biopsychosocial needs.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, all participants provided written or electronic consent before study commencement. Patient-completed questionnaires captured information related to a broad range of biopsychosocial parameters during the month preceding TKA. These included demographic factors (sex, age, and rurality), psychological factors (mood status, pain catastrophizing, resilience, and committed action), quality of life, social support, lifestyle factors, and knee symptoms. Physical measures assessing mobility, balance, and functional lower body strength were performed via video calls with patients in their home. Information related to preexisting health issues and concomitant medications was derived from hospital medical records. Patient recovery outcomes were assessed 3 months after the surgical procedure and included quality of life, patient-reported knee symptoms, satisfaction with the surgical procedure, and mood status. Machine learning data analysis techniques will be applied to determine which presurgery parameters have the strongest power for predicting patient recovery following total knee replacement. On the basis of these analyses, a predictive model will be developed. Predictive models will undergo internal validation, and Bayesian analysis will be applied to provide additional metrics regarding prediction accuracy.

resultsPatient recruitment and data collection commenced in November 2019 and was completed in June 2022. A total of 1050 patients who underwent TKA were enrolled in this study.

conclusionsOur findings will facilitate the development of the first comprehensive biopsychosocial prediction tool, which has the potential to objectively predict a patient's individual recovery outcomes following TKA once selected by an orthopedic surgeon to undergo TKA. If successful, the tool could also inform the evolution rehabilitation services, such that factors in addition to physical performance can be addressed and have the potential to further enhance patient recovery and satisfaction. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48801.

Indexed as

biopsychosocialclinical decision supportknee arthroplastypatient recruitmentpatient-reported outcomepatient-reported outcomespatient stratificationpredictive clinical decision toolpresurgeryprospectivepsychosocialquality of liferecovery trajectoriesrehabilitationtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37556181
PMCPMC10448293
OpenAlexW4383267394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.