Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37556028›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Are the Pilots Onboard? Equipping Radiologists for Clinical Implementation of AI.

Umber Shafique, Umar Shafique Chaudhry, Alexander J Towbin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Umber ShafiqueIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. radumber@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-1912
Umar Shafique ChaudhryUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Alexander J TowbinDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of artificial intelligence into radiological clinical workflow is on the verge of being realized. To ensure that these tools are effective, measures must be taken to educate radiologists on tool performance and failure modes. Additionally, radiology systems should be designed to avoid automation bias and the potential decline in radiologist performance. Designed solutions should cater to every level of expertise so that patient care can be enhanced and risks reduced. Ultimately, the radiology community must provide education so that radiologists can learn about algorithms, their inputs and outputs, and potential ways they may fail. This manuscript will present suggestions on how to train radiologists to use these new digital systems, how to detect AI errors, and how to maintain underlying diagnostic competency when the algorithm fails.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyAlgorithmsHumansRadiographyRadiologistsAIPilotsRadiologistsSafety education

Identifiers

PMID37556028
PMCPMC10584741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.