Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37556026›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Physiology of Stretch-Mediated Hypertrophy and Strength Increases: A Narrative Review.

Konstantin Warneke, Lars H Lohmann, Camila D Lima, Karsten Hollander, Andreas Konrad, Astrid Zech, Masatoshi Nakamura, Klaus Wirth, Michael Keiner, David G Behm

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Konstantin WarnekeInstitute for Exercise, Sport and Health, Leuphana University, Universitätsallee 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Deutschland, Germany. Konstantin.Warneke@aau.at.ORCID 0000-0003-4964-2867
Lars H LohmannUniversity Sports Center, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Camila D LimaSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Karsten HollanderInstitute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas KonradInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Astrid ZechDepartment of Human Motion Science and Exercise Physiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Masatoshi NakamuraFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nishi Kyushu University, Ozaki, Kanzaki, Saga, Japan.
Klaus WirthInstitute of Sport Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Michael KeinerDepartment of Sport Science, German University of Health and Sport, Ismaning, Germany.
David G BehmSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CACarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEEdith Cowan University · AUFachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · ATFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEGerman Sport University Cologne · DELeuphana University of Lüneburg · DEMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DENishikyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing muscle strength and cross-sectional area is of crucial importance to improve or maintain physical function in musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports performance. Decreases in muscular performance are experienced in phases of reduced physical activity or immobilization. These decrements highlight the need for alternative, easily accessible training regimens for a sedentary population to improve rehabilitation and injury prevention routines. Commonly, muscle hypertrophy and strength increases are associated with resistance training, typically performed in a training facility. Mechanical tension, which is usually induced with resistance machines and devices, is known to be an important factor that stimulates the underlying signaling pathways to enhance protein synthesis. Findings from animal studies suggest an alternative means to induce mechanical tension to enhance protein synthesis, and therefore muscle hypertrophy by inducing high-volume stretching. Thus, this narrative review discusses mechanical tension-induced physiological adaptations and their impact on muscle hypertrophy and strength gains. Furthermore, research addressing stretch-induced hypertrophy is critically analyzed. Derived from animal research, the stretching literature exploring the impact of static stretching on morphological and functional adaptations was reviewed and critically discussed. No studies have investigated the underlying physiological mechanisms in humans yet, and thus the underlying mechanisms remain speculative and must be discussed in the light of animal research. However, studies that reported functional and morphological increases in humans commonly used stretching durations of > 30 min per session of the plantar flexors, indicating the importance of high stretching volume, if the aim is to increase muscle mass and maximum strength. Therefore, the practical applicability seems limited to settings without access to resistance training (e.g., in an immobilized state at the start of rehabilitation), as resistance training seems to be more time efficient. Nevertheless, further research is needed to generate evidence in different human populations (athletes, sedentary individuals, and rehabilitation patients) and to quantify stretching intensity.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscle Stretching ExercisesResistance TrainingAnimalsHumansHypertrophy

Identifiers

PMID37556026
PMCPMC10587333
OpenAlexW4385683618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.