ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023
The Representation of Surgery in Oncology Clinical Trials: 2001 to 2022.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncovering Global Trends in Surgical Oncology Trials: Applying Natural Language Processing to ClinicalTrials.gov.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgery is a mainstay of cancer care. Since the advancement of cancer treatment occurs through clinical trials, it is critical to investigate the degree and nature of representation of surgery in oncological clinical trials.
methodsThis observational analysis used publicly available data from clinicaltrials.gov to investigate non-industry-funded oncological clinical trials in the United States between 2012 and 2022.
resultsFrom 2012 to 2022, 1,861 (15.7%) of the 11,843 registered oncologic clinical trials were surgical. There was a 43.2% increase in proportional surgical trials and an 18.9% increase in oncology trials over the last two decades. Surgery+diagnostic-technique trials increased from 5.14 to 12.6% (P < 0.001, 95%CI [- 0.097, - 0.052]), surgery+radiation trials increased from 5.24 to 8.1% (P = 0.004, 95%CI [- 0.047, - 0.0088]), surgery+systemic-therapy trials decreased from 34.5 to 29.2% (P = 0.003, 95%CI [0.018, 0.088]), surgery+supportive-therapy trials increased from 8.0 to 11.3% (P = 0.004, 95%CI [- 0.056, - 0.01]) and 'surgery-as-the-variable' trials decreased from 12.0 to 3.5% (P < 0.001, 95%CI[0.065, 0.1]). Systemic therapy with biologics increased from 38.1 to 53.9% (P < 0.001, 95%CI [- 0.22, - 0.091]). Surgery-vs.-no-surgery trials increased from 16.8 to 37.3% (P = 0.001, 95%CI [- 0.32, - 0.078]).
conclusionSurgical oncology trials increased by 43.2% over the last 10 years. The focus of clinical trials is changing to the encouragement of innovation in more diagnostic and less invasive techniques, and targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.