Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37556003›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2023

Residual fragment size following retrograde intrarenal surgery: a critical evaluation of related variables.

Mehmet Uslu, Ümit Yıldırım, Mehmet Ezer, İsmet Bilger Erihan, Kemal Sarıca

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07018934 (Comparison of the Efficacy of Alpha-Blockers and Mirabegron on Symptoms Associated With Double-J Stent Implanted After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07018934 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Efficacy of Alpha-Blockers and Mirabegron on Symptoms Associated With Double-J Stent Implanted After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of GaziantepRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsUreteral Stent-Related Symptoms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet UsluKafkas University, Kars, Turkey. dr.mhmtuslu@gmail.com.
Ümit YıldırımKafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Mehmet EzerKafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
İsmet Bilger ErihanKafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Kemal SarıcaSancaktepe Şehit Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kafkas University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the limited data on the predictive factors of residual kidney stone size after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), this study aims to investigate the variables affecting residual stone size. The medical records of 642 patients without complications being treated for kidney stones with fURS between July 2014 and May 2022 were reviewed retrospectively, and the information of the 170 patients in whom residual stones were found was recorded. In addition to patient-specific factors and stone characteristics, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative fever, and preoperative antiaggregant use were evaluated. Of the 170 patients ultimately included in the study. The mean age was 51.56 (± 14.70). The mean stone size was 14.01 mm (± 5.75), the mean residual stone size was 7.04 mm (± 2.51), and the mean stone density was 829 Hounsfield units (± 395.06). The mean infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) was 49.37º (± 15.37), and 41.2% of the stones were non-opaque. The mean parenchymal thickness was 22.88 mm (± 5.55). 34 patients were on antiaggregant therapy. Preoperative stone size increases in stone density and decreases in IPA were found to be correlated with increase residual stone size (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, larger residual stones were observed after the fURS procedure in patients using anticoagulants and those without hydronephrosis (p = 0.02 and p = 0.016, respectively). Use of reliable predictive factors to forecast residual stone size after fURS may help to inform those treated and enable urologists to design rational surgical strategies.

Indexed as

KidneyKidney CalculiHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUreteroscopesUreteroscopyFlexibleResidualRetrogradeSizeStone

Identifiers

PMID37556003
OpenAlexW4385684530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.