Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555985›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2023

The diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer diagnosis: a review.

Pier Paolo Avolio, Giovanni Lughezzani, Maurice Anidjar, Toufic Hassan, Alexis Rompré-Brodeur, Nicolò Maria Buffi, Massimo Lazzeri, Rafael Sanchez-Salas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Microultrasound imaging for accuracy of diagnosis in prostate cancer: a single‑center observational study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pier Paolo AvolioDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Giovanni LughezzaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Maurice AnidjarDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Toufic HassanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Alexis Rompré-BrodeurDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Nicolò Maria BuffiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Massimo LazzeriDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Rafael Sanchez-SalasDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. rafael.sanchez-salas@mcgill.ca.
McGill University Health Centre · CAHumanitas University · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMicro-UltraSound (microUS) is a new imaging modality capable of identifying and targeting suspicious areas, which might further increase the diagnostic yield of prostate biopsy (PBx). Aim of this review is to provide insights into the usefulness of microUS for the sub-stratification of prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant PCa (i.e., any Gleason score ≥ 7 PCa; csPCa) along with non-organ-confined disease in patients undergoing PBx.

methodsA PubMed literature search was performed using keywords: prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer diagnosis surveillance, systematic biopsy, target biopsy, micro-ultrasound, and prostate risk identification using micro-ultrasound.

resultsMicroUS could significantly improve multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings by adding valuable anatomical and pathological information provided by real-time examination. Furthermore, microUS target biopsy could replace systematic biopsy in clinical practice by reducing the detection of clinically insignificant (ciPCa) and increasing that of csPCa. Finally, microUS may be useful in predicting the presence of non-organ confined PCa before radical prostatectomy and it could also be an effective add-on tool for patient monitoring within the active surveillance program.

conclusionMicroUS may represent an attractive step forward for the management of csPCa as a complementary or alternative tool to mpMRI. Nevertheless, further longitudinal studies are warranted, and the strength of the evidence is still suboptimal to provide clear recommendations for daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenActive surveillanceMicro-ultrasoundMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerTransrectal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37555985
OpenAlexW4385684016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.