Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555966›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2023

Comparison between laser and transobturator tape therapy in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and role of overweight in treatment: a prospective observational study.

Feray Çağıran Yılmaz, Murat Açık, Fatma Çağıran

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Feray Çağıran YılmazDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-9558
Murat AçıkDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey. macik@firat.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-3104-6306
Fatma ÇağıranPrivate Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-2516
Dicle University · TRDiyarbakır Askeri Hastanesi · TRFırat University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is treated with transobturator tape (TOT) sling procedures, but problems arise with artificial mesh in certain instances. Hence, non-invasive laser therapy may be useful under such circumstances. The current study was aimed at comparing the effects of these two treatments and at checking their applicability in various body mass index (BMI) groups.

methodsSeventy-nine patients, who were clinically diagnosed with SUI, were divided into two groups, those who preferred TOT and those who preferred the transvaginal fractional micro-ablative CO

resultsThe ICIQ-SF score decreased by 56.8% for laser therapy and 43.5% for TOT therapy (mean ± SE = 5.97 ± 0.16 and 5.09 ± 0.14 respectively). Laser therapy had a better effect on ICIQ-SF than TOT therapy (η2p: 0.176, p

conclusionsThe efficacy of laser therapy for urinary incontinence was confirmed. Furthermore, it was observed that being overweight may be a risk factor for the failure of laser therapy.

Indexed as

Lasers, GasSuburethral SlingsUrinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressHumansOverweightTreatment OutcomeOverweightQuality of lifeStress urinary incontinenceTransvaginal fractional micro-ablative CO2 laser system

Identifiers

PMID37555966
OpenAlexW4385683711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.