Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555957›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Breast MRI in patients with implantable loop recorder: initial experience.

Noam Nissan, Rosa Elena Ochoa-Albiztegui, Hila Fruchtman, Jill Gluskin, Sarah Eskreis-Winkler, Joao V Horvat, Ioanna Kosmidou, Alicia Meng, Katja Pinker, Maxine S Jochelson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noam NissanDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Rosa Elena Ochoa-AlbizteguiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Hila FruchtmanDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Jill GluskinDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Sarah Eskreis-WinklerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Joao V HorvatDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Ioanna KosmidouDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Alicia MengDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Maxine S JochelsonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. jochelsm@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-2470
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the feasibility of breast MRI exams and guided biopsies in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) as well as the impact ILRs may have on image interpretation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study examined breast MRIs of patients with ILR, from April 2008 to September 2022. Radiological reports and electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, safety concerns, and imaging findings. MR images were analyzed and compared statistically for artifact quantification on the various pulse sequences.

resultsOverall, 40/82,778 (0.049%) MRIs during the study period included ILR. All MRIs were completed without early termination. No patient-related or device-related adverse events occurred. ILRs were most commonly located in the left lower-inner quadrant (64.6%). The main artifact was a signal intensity (SI) void in a dipole formation in the ILR bed with or without areas of peripheral high SI. Artifacts appeared greatest in the cranio-caudal axis (p < 0.001), followed by the anterior-posterior axis (p < 0.001), and then the right-left axis. High peripheral rim-like SI artifacts appeared on the post-contrast and subtracted T1-weighted images, mimicking suspicious enhancement. Artifacts were most prominent on diffusion-weighted (p < 0.001), followed by T2-weighted and T1-weighted images. In eight patients, suspicious findings were found on MRI, resulting in four additional malignant lesions. Of six patients with left breast cancer, the tumor was completely visible in five cases and partially obscured in one.

conclusionBreast MRI is feasible and safe among patients with ILR and may provide a significant diagnostic value, albeit with localized, characteristic artifacts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Indicated breast MRI exams and guided biopsies can be safely performed in patients with implantable loop recorder. Nevertheless, radiologists should be aware of associated limitations including limited assessment of the inner left breast and pseudo-enhancement artifacts. KEY POINTS: • Breast MRI in patients with an implantable loop recorder is an infrequent, feasible, and safe procedure. • Despite limited breast visualization of the implantable loop recorder bed and characteristic artifacts, MRI depicted additional lesions in 8/40 (20%) of cases, half of which were malignant. • Breast MRI in patients with an implantable loop recorder should be performed when indicated, taking into consideration typical associated artifacts.

Indexed as

Electrocardiography, AmbulatoryMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansProstheses and ImplantsRadiographyRetrospective StudiesArtifactsBreast neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37555957
PMCPMC11181953
OpenAlexW4385684429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.