Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555941›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

The structure of cognitive strategies for wayfinding decisions.

Otmar Bock, Ju-Yi Huang, Oezguer A Onur, Daniel Memmert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Otmar BockInstitute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany. bock@dshs-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-6765
Ju-Yi HuangInstitute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8527-1312
Oezguer A OnurDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-7075
Daniel MemmertInstitute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3406-9175

Funding

Marga und Walter Boll-Stiftung 210-05. 01-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature proposes five distinct cognitive strategies for wayfinding decisions at intersections. Our study investigates whether those strategies rely on a generalized decision-making process, on two frame-specific processes-one in an egocentric and the other in an allocentric spatial reference frame, and/or on five strategy-specific processes. Participants took six trips along a prescribed route through five virtual mazes, each designed for decision-making by a particular strategy. We found that wayfinding accuracy on trips through a given maze correlated significantly with the accuracy on trips through another maze that was designed for a different reference frame (r

Indexed as

Space PerceptionUser-Computer InterfaceCognitionHumansMaze Learning

Identifiers

PMID37555941
PMCPMC10858108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.