ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Adalimumab rapidly controls both anterior and posterior inflammation in patients with ocular Behçet syndrome and non-infectious uveitis refractory to conventional therapy: a prospective, 6-month follow-up investigation.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying outcome measures for clinical trials in juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis for the MIWGUC proposal: a scoping review to create domains from existing outcome measures.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Article
- Adalimumab in Focus: Evaluating Effectiveness and Safety in Non-Infectious Uveitis at a Tertiary Referral Center in Türkiye.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Article
- Uveitis in paediatric Behçet disease: a large multicentric Italian cohort.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Article
- Monitoring Behçet uveitis.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA, Humira
methodsAnti-tumor necrosis factor-α naive patients with NIU unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive treatment were treated with ADA. Most cases with NIU were related to ocular Behçet syndrome. Adult cases used 80 mg ADA subcutaneously on day 0, 40 mg in the first week, and then 40 mg every 2-week, while this was 20 mg in children. Evaluations were performed pre-treatment and at weeks 2, 8, and 24. The study endpoints were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, LogMAR) improvement, anterior chamber (AC) cell grade, vitreous cell and haze grades, decrease in macular thickness and edema, prednisolone dose, immunosuppressive dose, and adverse reactions.
resultsThirty-eight eyes (19 right, 19 left) of 24 patients (14 female, 10 male) with (ocular Behçet syndrome) OBS (n = 27 eyes/18 patients) and NIU (n = 11 eyes/6 patients) were included. Mean age was 29.0 ± 14.1 years (range, 5-49) and follow-up time was 24 weeks. After ADA, BCVA increased (p < 0.001), and improvements in AC cell grade (p < 0.001), vitreous cell grade (p < 0.001), and vitreal haze grade (p < 0.001) were achieved at the final visit. Mean macular thickness decreased from 243.5 to 235.5 µm (p < 0.001). Such a rapid control of both anterior and posterior uveitis was observed in all eyes as early as the second week without relapses during follow-up. No ocular or systemic complications emerged during treatment.
conclusionsADA is effective and well-tolerated in pediatric and adolescent patients with NIU including OBS refractory to traditional medications and demonstrated corticosteroid- and immunosuppressive-sparing effects with no major side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37555889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.