Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555832›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of public health2023

The effect of a pre-scheduled appointment on attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme.

Mathijs M Goossens, Eliane Kellen, Mireille J M Broeders, Els Vandemaele, Brenda Jacobs, Patrick Martens

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathijs M GoossensDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Eliane KellenCentrum voor Kankeropsporing (Centre for Cancer Detection), Brugge, Belgium.
Mireille J M BroedersDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Els VandemaeleCentrum voor Kankeropsporing (Centre for Cancer Detection), Brugge, Belgium.
Brenda JacobsDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Patrick MartensCentrum voor Kankeropsporing (Centre for Cancer Detection), Brugge, Belgium.

Funding

PMSPThe national and regional funders of the PMSP ('Vlaamse Overheid' and 'Rijksinstituut voor Ziekte- en Invaliditeitsverzekering')
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-scheduled appointments can increase attendance in breast cancer screening programmes compared to 'open invitations' but relatively few randomized controlled trials exist. We investigated the effect of a pre-scheduled appointment on uptake in the Flemish population-based mammography screening programme.

methodsBetween September and December 2022, a total of 4798 women were randomly assigned to receive either a pre-scheduled appointment or open invitation. The difference in attendance was compared with Poisson regression analysis for the primary endpoint (attendance ≤92 days after date of invitation), yielding relative risks (RRs). This was done separately for three groups: women invited to a mobile unit and a history of nonattendance (group M-NA); women invited to a hospital-based unit and a history of nonattendance (group HB-NA); women invited to a hospital-based unit and a history of irregular attendance (group HB-IA). There were no women invited to a mobile unit and a history of irregular attendance.

resultsThe RRs in favour of the pre-scheduled appointment were 2.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-2.88], 1.8 (95% CI 1.07-2.97) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.43-2.39), for groups M-NA, HB-NA and HB-IA, respectively. We found no statistically significant difference between the various RRs. The respective absolute gains in attendance between pre-scheduled appointment and open invitation were 8.3%, 4.4% and 15.8%.

conclusionsSending an invitation with a pre-scheduled appointment is an effective tool to increase screening attendance in both mobile and hospital-based screening units. The pre-scheduled appointment is associated with a considerable absolute gain in attendance which varies depending on the screening history.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyAppointments and SchedulesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID37555832
PMCPMC10710327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.