Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555701›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2023

Prioritizing population oral health through public policy in Australia: the Victorian experience.

Tan Minh Nguyen, Clare Lin, Anil Raichur, Amy Patterson, Martin Hall, Rosemary Aldrich, Suzanne Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tan Minh NguyenOral Health Economics Research Stream, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9986-7629
Clare LinDental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4757-5867
Anil RaichurCommunity Based Health Services Policy & Improvement, Commisioning and System Improvement, Victorian Department of Health, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amy PattersonDental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-1707-6407
Martin HallDental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5779-3879
Rosemary AldrichGrampians Public Health Unit, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-2781-9341
Suzanne RobinsonOral Health Economics Research Stream, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5703-6475

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1189800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries, a non-communicable disease, is one of the most prevalent diseases globally and share common modifiable risk factors with obesity such as excess sugar intake. However, prioritization by governments to improve population oral health has been limited and is typically excluded from the discourse of public health policy development. Therefore, interventions that target dental caries can have other co-benefits including obesity prevention. In Victoria, Australia, local government authorities have a regulatory requirement to develop their Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plans. The aim of this paper is to identify whether prioritization for oral health by local government authorities in Victoria has changed through the subsequent renewal of the Victorian Public Health and Wellbeing Plans 2011-2015 and 2019-2023. Three desktop audits for all publicly available Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plans by local government authorities in Victoria were conducted between 2014 and 2022. Key terms related to oral health was searched within these policy documents and categorized into six indicators: (i) included oral health as a priority, (ii) linked healthy eating and oral health, (iii) supported the Achievement Program, (iv) included the Smiles 4 Miles program, (v) advocated for fluoridated drinking water, and (vi) included other strategies related to oral health. Overall, there was statistically significant reduction in five of the six indicators, with the exception for prioritization of other strategies related to oral health such as targeting excess sugar intake and smoking. A multi-sectoral approach, that includes oral health would be advantageous to address the growing burden of non-communicable diseases.

Indexed as

Dental CariesOral HealthHealth PolicyHumansLocal GovernmentObesityPublic PolicySugarsVictoriaSugarschildhood obesityhealth policyhealth promotionnon-communicable diseasespublic health practice

Identifiers

PMID37555701
PMCPMC10411047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.