Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555567›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2023

Dietary patterns in North and South India: a comparison with EAT-Lancet dietary recommendations.

Anjali Ganpule, Manisha Dubey, Himanshi Pandey, Rosemary Green, Kerry Ann Brown, Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Prashant Jarhyan, Avinav Prasad Maddury, Rajesh Khatkar, Dorairaj Prabhakaran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anjali GanpuleCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Manisha DubeyCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Himanshi PandeyCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Rosemary GreenLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kerry Ann BrownUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Nikhil Srinivasapura VenkateshmurthyCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-6371
Prashant JarhyanPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Avinav Prasad MadduryPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Rajesh KhatkarPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Sailesh MohanCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205200Wellcome Trust 205200/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmentally sustainable diets are represented in the EAT-Lancet recommendations developed by the Lancet Commission on Planetary Health in 2019. Very few studies have compared Indian diets with the EAT-Lancet recommendations. The present study performed such a comparison using primary dietary consumption data from adults in north and south India.

methodsData from 8762 adults (52.4 ± 11.7 years) residing in Sonipat and Vizag India were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, wealth index (household assets) and dietary intake (food frequency questionnaire: nine food groups). The quantity consumed and energy from each food group was compared with the EAT-Lancet recommendations. We investigated the likelihood of deficit or excess in consumption compared to the EAT-Lancet recommendations by different sociodemographic factors.

resultsHalf of the participants were women and half resided in rural areas. Vegetables and fruits were consumed in lower quantity, whereas dairy and added fats were consumed in higher quantity than recommended by the EAT-Lancet recommendations. For whole grains, female gender and poorest wealth index were the factors associated with deficit or no consumption, whereas, for vegetables and fruits, it was poorest wealth index and residence in rural areas (p < 0.05, all). Rural residence and poorest wealth index were associated with excess consumption of dairy and added fats (p < 0.05, all).

conclusionsThe diets of the study participants were mainly plant-based, and high in dairy but lacking in nutrient-rich foods such as vegetables and fruits. Appropriate policy actions for making healthy sustainable diets and micronutrient-rich foods available and affordable to all with a particular focus on the poor and rural populations are warranted.

Indexed as

DietDiet, HealthyAdultEatingFemaleFruitHumansMaleVegetablesadultsEAT-Lancet recommendationsIndian diets

Identifiers

PMID37555567
PMCPMC7616295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.