Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555375›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2023

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on prenatal and postpartum patient experiences and well-being.

Kirsten A Riggan, Amy L Weaver, Grayson Ashby, Lily Huang, Margaret E Long, Vanessa E Torbenson, Myra J Wick, Megan A Allyse, Enid Y Rivera-Chiauzzi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirsten A RigganBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-9555
Amy L WeaverDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Grayson AshbyMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Lily HuangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3713-3443
Margaret E LongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8655-1764
Vanessa E TorbensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-3308
Myra J WickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Megan A AllyseBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6136-9256
Enid Y Rivera-ChiauzziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6416-3923
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Factors Influencing Access and Utilization of Genetic Prenatal Care Services Among Women from Underserved PopulationsK01HG009542 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALLYSE, MEGAN A. · 2018 to 2022
$809k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG009542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has yet to be fully elucidated how differing populations of obstetric patients adapted to the disruptions in perinatal care and postpartum support from the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed an enriched sample of socioeconomically advantaged patients to understand the influence of COVID-19 on their perinatal care experience, well-being, and coping.

methodsWe surveyed pregnant and postpartum patients (n = 6140) at a large academic medical center in the Midwest of the United States using the Coronavirus and Perinatal Experiences instrument in Spring 2021.

resultsThe survey was sent to 6141 pregnant and postpartum patients; 1180 (17.8%) respondents completed the survey, including 256 who were pregnant and 834 postpartum. Most pregnant patients experienced no changes in their prenatal care with 16.5% indicating somewhat worsened care. In the postpartum cohort, 37.5% stated their care had somewhat worsened. In describing influences on stress and mental health, 58.1% of postpartum respondents stated it was moderately, and 17.4% significantly, worse. The pandemic had a somewhat or moderately negative influence for 72.7% of respondents, with 11.0% stating these effects were extremely negative. Both cohorts characterized a range of coping strategies, most commonly, talking with friends and family (76.3%). CONCLUSION(S): Even among this sample of socioeconomically advantaged patients, respondents indicated that the pandemic disrupted many facets of their medical care and daily life, especially social activities and postpartum support. Our findings suggest that counseling on coping and adaptation strategies for stressors and increased health systems support be part of perinatal care during public health emergencies for all demographic groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHumansPandemicsParturitionPatient Outcome AssessmentPostpartum PeriodPregnancyUnited Statespostpartum carepregnancyprenatal carequantitative researchSARS-Cov-2stress

Identifiers

PMID37555375
PMCPMC10843728
OpenAlexW4385684890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.