Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555202›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023

Analysing lumbar pedicle morphometry observed via traditional and recent modalities.

Ananya Priya, Ravi Kant Narayan, Sanjib Kumar Ghosh, Pradosh Kumar Sarangi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design and radiological confirmation of three-column cortical bone trajectory in the lower thoracic vertebrae.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ananya PriyaDepartment of Anatomy, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Ravi Kant NarayanDepartment of Anatomy, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Bihta, Patna, Bihar, India.
Sanjib Kumar GhoshDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Science, Patna, Bihar, India.
Pradosh Kumar SarangiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Science, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The present study was conducted to collect morphometric data on the lumbar vertebrae pedicles of the adult population from the eastern parts of India and analyse the variations, if any, with other parts of the country and the world. Methods: The retrospective cross-sectional study where lumbar pedicle morphometric data was obtained via dried bone, the 3D Lumbar vertebrae images were obtained by scanning the dried lumbar vertebrae, and the 3D lumbar vertebrae model was generated from a 1 mm thin CT scan slice of the Lumbar spine of patients who were advised to have a CT scan of the abdomen for reasons other than related to the vertebral column. Both linear and angular measurements in the lumbar pedicles were made bilaterally. Results: The transverse pedicle width is widest at L3 and the narrowest at L2 vertebra bilaterally. The sagittal pedicle width at L4 vertebrae was observed to be the widest bilaterally, while L3 had the narrowest pedicle. The pedicular and body length along the pedicular axis is longer than the central axis at all the lumbar levels. The linear measurement along the pedicular axis was longest at L5 bilaterally via both modes, with a range of 18.2-47.31 mm for bones and 21.03-49.28 mm for CT scan morphometry. The transverse pedicular angle on analysis was observed to increase as one goes down the spine from L1 to L5, with a steep rise between L4 and L5. In contrast, the sagittal pedicular angle decreased as we went caudally toward the L5 vertebrae. Conclusion: The present study data had significant differences among the values reported in the literature from the different populations for the parameters studied. The data obtained by this study will be highly beneficial for the success of the free-hand technique of pedicle screw insertion.

Indexed as

Lumbar vertebraePedicleSagittal pedicle angleSagittal pedicle widthTransverse pedicle angleTransverse pedicle width

Identifiers

PMID37555202
PMCPMC10405167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.