ArticleComputer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization2023
Mixed Reality Interfaces for Achieving Desired Views with Robotic X-ray Systems.
Article in Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pelphix: Surgical Phase Recognition from X-ray Images in Percutaneous Pelvic Fixation.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023Article
- An autonomous X-ray image acquisition and interpretation system for assisting percutaneous pelvic fracture fixation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic X-ray C-arm imaging systems can precisely achieve any position and orientation relative to the patient. Informing the system, however, what pose exactly corresponds to a desired view is challenging. Currently these systems are operated by the surgeon using joysticks, but this interaction paradigm is not necessarily effective because users may be unable to efficiently actuate more than a single axis of the system simultaneously. Moreover, novel robotic imaging systems, such as the Brainlab Loop-X, allow for independent source and detector movements, adding even more complexity. To address this challenge, we consider complementary interfaces for the surgeon to command robotic X-ray systems effectively. Specifically, we consider three interaction paradigms: (1) the use of a pointer to specify the principal ray of the desired view relative to the anatomy, (2) the same pointer, but combined with a mixed reality environment to synchronously render digitally reconstructed radiographs from the tool's pose, and (3) the same mixed reality environment but with a virtual X-ray source instead of the pointer. Initial human-in-the-loop evaluation with an attending trauma surgeon indicates that mixed reality interfaces for robotic X-ray system control are promising and may contribute to substantially reducing the number of X-ray images acquired solely during "fluoro hunting" for the desired view or standard plane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.