Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555157›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2022

Quantitative evaluation of the influence of multiple MRI sequences and of pathological tissues on the registration of longitudinal data acquired during brain tumor treatment.

Luca Canalini, Jan Klein, Diana Waldmannstetter, Florian Kofler, Stefano Cerri, Alessa Hering, Stefan Heldmann, Sarah Schlaeger, Bjoern H Menze, Benedikt Wiestler and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luca CanaliniFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Jan KleinFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Diana WaldmannstetterImage-Based Biomedical Modeling, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian KoflerImage-Based Biomedical Modeling, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefano CerriAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Alessa HeringFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Lübeck, Germany.
Stefan HeldmannFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Lübeck, Germany.
Sarah SchlaegerDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bjoern H MenzeImage-Based Biomedical Modeling, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt WiestlerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan KirschkeDepartment of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Horst K HahnFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Registration methods facilitate the comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance images acquired at different stages of brain tumor treatments. Image-based registration solutions are influenced by the sequences chosen to compute the distance measure, and the lack of image correspondences due to the resection cavities and pathological tissues. Nonetheless, an evaluation of the impact of these input parameters on the registration of longitudinal data is still missing. This work evaluates the influence of multiple sequences, namely T1-weighted (T1), T2-weighted (T2), contrast enhanced T1-weighted (T1-CE), and T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and the exclusion of the pathological tissues on the non-rigid registration of pre- and post-operative images. We here investigate two types of registration methods, an iterative approach and a convolutional neural network solution based on a 3D U-Net. We employ two test sets to compute the mean target registration error (mTRE) based on corresponding landmarks. In the first set, markers are positioned exclusively in the surroundings of the pathology. The methods employing T1-CE achieves the lowest mTREs, with a improvement up to 0.8 mm for the iterative solution. The results are higher than the baseline when using the FLAIR sequence. When excluding the pathology, lower mTREs are observable for most of the methods. In the second test set, corresponding landmarks are located in the entire brain volumes. Both solutions employing T1-CE obtain the lowest mTREs, with a decrease up to 1.16 mm for the iterative method, whereas the results worsen using the FLAIR. When excluding the pathology, an improvement is observable for the CNN method using T1-CE. Both approaches utilizing the T1-CE sequence obtain the best mTREs, whereas the FLAIR is the least informative to guide the registration process. Besides, the exclusion of pathology from the distance measure computation improves the registration of the brain tissues surrounding the tumor. Thus, this work provides the first numerical evaluation of the influence of these parameters on the registration of longitudinal magnetic resonance images, and it can be helpful for developing future algorithms.

Indexed as

brainconvolutional neural networkdeep learningimage registrationMRItumor

Identifiers

PMID37555157
PMCPMC10406206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.