Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37555147›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2022

Using transfer learning for automated microbleed segmentation.

Mahsa Dadar, Maryna Zhernovaia, Sawsan Mahmoud, Richard Camicioli, Josefina Maranzano, Simon Duchesne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahsa DadarDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maryna ZhernovaiaDepartment of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Sawsan MahmoudDepartment of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Richard CamicioliDepartment of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Josefina MaranzanoDepartment of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Simon DuchesneCERVO Brain Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral microbleeds are small perivascular hemorrhages that can occur in both gray and white matter brain regions. Microbleeds are a marker of cerebrovascular pathology and are associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Microbleeds can be identified and manually segmented by expert radiologists and neurologists, usually from susceptibility-contrast MRI. The latter is hard to harmonize across scanners, while manual segmentation is laborious, time-consuming, and subject to interrater and intrarater variability. Automated techniques so far have shown high accuracy at a neighborhood ("patch") level at the expense of a high number of false positive voxel-wise lesions. We aimed to develop an automated, more precise microbleed segmentation tool that can use standardizable MRI contrasts. Methods: We first trained a ResNet50 network on another MRI segmentation task (cerebrospinal fluid vs. background segmentation) using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and T2 Results: The proposed method achieved high performance, with a patch-level sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.57, 99.16, and 99.93%, respectively. At a per lesion level, sensitivity, precision, and Dice similarity index values were 89.1, 20.1, and 0.28% for cortical GM; 100, 100, and 1.0% for deep GM; and 91.1, 44.3, and 0.58% for WM, respectively. Discussion: The proposed microbleed segmentation method is more suitable for the automated detection of microbleeds with high sensitivity.

Indexed as

cerebrovascular diseasedeep neural networksmagnetic resonance imagingmicrobleedstransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37555147
PMCPMC10406212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.