ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Neonatal giant mastauxe: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant mastauxe is an uncomplicated physiological enlargement of the breasts in newborns, characterized by a breast bud diameter greater than 3 cm. While most newborns have some degree of breast enlargement, giant mastauxe is rare, which may be unnecessarily intervened upon. Case presentation: A 13-day-term male neonate presented with bilateral breast enlargement and milky nipple discharge, which worsened upon breast massage. The mother had an uneventful pregnancy, and neither the mother nor the baby had a history of drug intake. The examination revealed soft, non-tender, non-erythematous bilateral breast swellings measuring 3.6×3.8 cm on the right side and 3.2×3.4 cm on the left side. Ultrasonography confirmed their hypoechoic nature with minimum vascularization. The white blood cell count, C-reactive protein levels, and culture of nipple discharge yielded normal results. The baby was discharged, and upon follow-up after 2 weeks, it was observed that breast swellings had spontaneously reduced in size. Discussion: Neonatal breast enlargement can occur as a result of either the transplacental transfer of maternal estrogens or declining levels of estrogens toward the end of pregnancy, leading to hyperprolactinemia. However, the exact reasons behind the occurrence of giant mastauxe in some newborns remain incompletely understood. It may be due to increased sensitivity of the breast tissue to estrogens. Conclusion: Proper clinical examination, along with the use of ultrasonography and/or laboratory investigations if required, is essential to differentiate giant mastauxe from neonatal mastitis or breast abscess. Treatment primarily involves observation and providing reassurance to parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.