Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554757›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2023

Long-term follow-up in patients with coeliac disease in the pandemic-era: a view from Sheffield the NHS England national centre for adult coeliac disease.

Nick Trott, Suneil A Raju, Anupam Rej, Olivia Hoffman, William Holland, James R Bebb, Leah Seamark, Marianne Williams, Cristian Costas Batlle, Yvonne M Jeanes and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. A Meta-Synthesis Exploring Daily Experiences of Adults With Coeliac Disease in Adhering to a Gluten-Free Diet.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Telemedicine in Coeliac Disease: In-Person Appointments Are Favoured by Patients With a Lower Education Attainment and Lower Household Income.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nick TrottAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Suneil A RajuAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Anupam RejAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Olivia HoffmanAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
William HollandAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
James R BebbDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, UK.
Leah SeamarkCommunity Dietetics, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Somerset, UK.
Marianne WilliamsCommunity Dietetics, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Somerset, UK.
Cristian Costas BatlleBradford teaching hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Yvonne M JeanesSchool of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, UK.
Luca ElliCenter for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Milano, Italy.
David S SandersAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Somerset NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Cornwall Hospital · GBUniversity of Roehampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore patients' follow-up preferences. Background: Optimal follow-up strategies for patients with coeliac disease remain a subject of debate. Research suggests patients' prefer review by dietitians with a doctor available as required. Methods: Patients with coeliac disease under review at our centre, completed a questionnaire assessing their views on what makes follow-up useful based on specific criteria. Bloods tests, symptoms review, dietary assessment, opportunity to ask questions and reassurance. Patients' preferences between follow-up with a hospital doctor, a hospital dietitian, a hospital dietitian with a doctor available, a general practitioner, no follow-up or access when needed were also evaluated. Results: 138 adult patients completed the questionnaire, 80% of patients reported following a strict gluten free diet (mean diagnosis was 7.2 years). Overall, 60% found their follow-up to be 'very useful' valuing their review of blood tests and symptoms (71%) reassurance (60%) and opportunity to ask questions (58%). Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available was the most preferred option of review (p<0.001) except when compared to hospital doctor (p=0.75). Novel modalities of follow-up such as telephone and video reviews were regarded as of equal value to face-to-face appointments (65% and 62% respectively). Digital applications were significantly less preferable (38%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available as needed was the most preferred follow-up method. However, in this study follow-up by a dietitian with doctor available and hospital doctor alone was statistically equivalent. Many patients consider telephone and video follow-up of equal value to face-to-face reviews.

Indexed as

Celiac diseaseFollow upGluten-free diet

Identifiers

PMID37554757
PMCPMC10404824
OpenAlexW4385684780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.