Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554725›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2023

Feasibility and tolerability of multimodal peripheral electrophysiological techniques in a cohort of patients with spinal muscular atrophy.

Leandra A A Ros, Boudewijn T H M Sleutjes, Diederik J L Stikvoort García, H Stephan Goedee, Fay-Lynn Asselman, Leonard H van den Berg, W Ludo van der Pol, Renske I Wadman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leandra A A RosDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Boudewijn T H M SleutjesDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diederik J L Stikvoort GarcíaDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H Stephan GoedeeDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fay-Lynn AsselmanDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leonard H van den BergDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W Ludo van der PolDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Renske I WadmanDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Electrophysiological techniques are emerging as an aid in identifying prognostic or therapeutic biomarkers in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), but electrophysiological assessments may be burdensome for patients. We, therefore, assessed feasibility and tolerability of multimodal peripheral non-invasive electrophysiological techniques in a cohort of patients with SMA. Methods: We conducted a single center, longitudinal cohort study investigating the feasibility and tolerability of applying multimodal electrophysiological techniques to the median nerve unilaterally. Techniques consisted of the compound muscle action potential scan, motor nerve excitability tests, repetitive nerve stimulation and sensory nerve action potential. We assessed tolerability using the numeric rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), and defined the protocol to be tolerable if the NRS score ≤ 3. The protocol was considered feasible if it could be performed according to test and quality standards. Results: We included 71 patients with SMA types 1-4 (median 39 years; range 13-67) and 63 patients at follow-up. The protocol was feasible in 98% of patients and was well-tolerated in up to 90% of patients. Median NRS score was 2 (range 0-6 at baseline and range 0-4 at follow-up (p < 0.01)). None of the patients declined follow-up assessment. Conclusions: Multimodal, peripheral, non-invasive, electrophysiological techniques applied to the median nerve are feasible and well-tolerated in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1-4. Significance: Our study supports the use of non-invasive multimodal electrophysiological assessments in adolescents and adults with SMA types 1-4.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological techniquesFeasibilityNumeric rating scaleSpinal muscular atrophyTolerability

Identifiers

PMID37554725
PMCPMC10404501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.