Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554722›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2023

Cancer caregivers at the end-of-life: How much me vs. how much we?

Sara Bybee, Megan Hebdon, Kristin Cloyes, Shirin Hiatt, Eli Iacob, Maija Reblin, Margaret Clayton, Lee Ellington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara BybeeUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.
Megan HebdonUT Austin School of Nursing, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX 78712, United States of America.
Kristin CloyesOregon Health & Science University, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR 97239-2941, United States of America.
Shirin HiattUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.
Eli IacobUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.
Maija ReblinUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine, Given Medical Building, E-126, 89 Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, United States of America.
Margaret ClaytonUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.
Lee EllingtonUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored cancer caregivers' individual and communal coping through their use of personal and communal pronouns during naturally occurring conversations.

methodsNurse-home hospice visits involving cancer patients and their partner caregivers were audio recorded and then transcribed. Pronoun use was analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) software and descriptive statistics compared patient and partner caregivers' pronoun use. Personal and communal pronoun use was examined within six identified topics of caregiver speech: patient medical care, daily life, emotion, criticism/disagreement, relationships with family/friends, and asserting needs.

resultsDyads (

conclusionPartner caregivers may find it easier to express emotions related to communal stressors, rather than their individual ability to cope with end-of-life caregiving. INNOVATION: Examining personal and communal pronoun use by partner caregivers during nurse-home hospice visits may provide a more objective measure of caregiver coping than standard self-report measures.

Indexed as

cancerCaregivingCommunal copingCommunicationPersonal agencyPronoun use

Identifiers

PMID37554722
PMCPMC10404724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.