Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554677›Full record

ArticleJournal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery

Comparing the Effect of Ketamine and Lidocaine on Agitation and Pain in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Safoora Omidvar, Fatemeh Ebrahimi, Nazanin Amini, Hesameddin Modir, Mansoreh Karimi Kia, Benyamin Rahmaty, Aref Zarei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Safoora OmidvarDepartment of Paramedicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Fatemeh EbrahimiDepartment of Paramedicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Nazanin AminiDepartment of Paramedicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Hesameddin ModirDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Mansoreh Karimi KiaDepartment of Paramedicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Benyamin RahmatyDepartment of ENT, Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Aref ZareiStudent Research Committee, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emergence agitation (EA) is an important clinical problem that occurs during the initial period of recovery from anesthesia. This study aimed to determine the effects of ketamine and lidocaine administered on agitation level, postoperative pain, and hemodynamic changes in adults after rhinoplasty. Materials and Methods: Totally 72 patients scheduled to undergo elective rhinoplasty were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups including control group ( Results: There was a significant difference between EA level between ketamine ( Conclusion: Ketamine and lidocaine are highly effective in preventing EA and pain control. Further studies with a greater sample size and longer follow-up period are needed to confirm the current findings.

Indexed as

Emergence agitationketaminelidocainerhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID37554677
PMCPMC10405540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.