Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554647›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2023

Deep learning-based segmentation of brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT scans in the presence of anomalies.

Annika Gerken, Sina Walluscheck, Peter Kohlmann, Ivana Galinovic, Kersten Villringer, Jochen B Fiebach, Jan Klein, Stefan Heldmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annika GerkenFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Sina WalluscheckFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Lübeck, Germany.
Peter KohlmannFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Berlin, Germany.
Ivana GalinovicCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB) Charité, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kersten VillringerCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB) Charité, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jochen B FiebachCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB) Charité, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan KleinFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Stefan HeldmannFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The automatic segmentation of brain parenchyma and cerebrospinal fluid-filled spaces such as the ventricular system is the first step for quantitative and qualitative analysis of brain CT data. For clinical practice and especially for diagnostics, it is crucial that such a method is robust to anatomical variability and pathological changes such as (hemorrhagic or neoplastic) lesions and chronic defects. This study investigates the increase in overall robustness of a deep learning algorithm that is gained by adding hemorrhage training data to an otherwise normal training cohort. Methods: A 2D U-Net is trained on subjects with normal appearing brain anatomy. In a second experiment the training data includes additional subjects with brain hemorrhage on image data of the RSNA Brain CT Hemorrhage Challenge with custom reference segmentations. The resulting networks are evaluated on normal and hemorrhage test casesseparately, and on an independent test set of patients with brain tumors of the publicly available GLIS-RT dataset. Results: Adding data with hemorrhage to the training set significantly improves the segmentation performance over an algorithm trained exclusively on normally appearing data, not only in the hemorrhage test set but also in the tumor test set. The performance on normally appearing data is stable. Overall, the improved algorithm achieves median Dice scores of 0.98 (parenchyma), 0.91 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.81 (third ventricle), and 0.80 (fourth ventricle) on the hemorrhage test set. On the tumor test set, the median Dice scores are 0.96 (parenchyma), 0.90 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.75 (third ventricle), and 0.73 (fourth ventricle). Conclusion: Training on an extended data set that includes pathologies is crucial and significantly increases the overall robustness of a segmentation algorithm for brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT data, also for anomalies completely unseen during training. Extension of the training set to include other diseases may further improve the generalizability of the algorithm.

Indexed as

deep learninghemorrhageparenchymasegmentationventricular system

Identifiers

PMID37554647
PMCPMC10406198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.