Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554629›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2023

AI-driven and automated MRI sequence optimization in scanner-independent MRI sequences formulated by a domain-specific language.

Daniel Christopher Hoinkiss, Jörn Huber, Christina Plump, Christoph Lüth, Rolf Drechsler, Matthias Günther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Christopher Hoinkiss *Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Imaging Physics, Bremen, Germany.
Jörn Huber *Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Imaging Physics, Bremen, Germany.
Christina Plump *German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Cyber-Physical Systems, Bremen, Germany.
Christoph LüthGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Cyber-Physical Systems, Bremen, Germany.
Rolf DrechslerGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Cyber-Physical Systems, Bremen, Germany.
Matthias GüntherFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Imaging Physics, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The complexity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences requires expert knowledge about the underlying contrast mechanisms to select from the wide range of available applications and protocols. Automation of this process using machine learning (ML) can support the radiologists and MR technicians by complementing their experience and finding the optimal MRI sequence and protocol for certain applications. Methods: We define domain-specific languages (DSL) both for describing MRI sequences and for formulating clinical demands for sequence optimization. By using various abstraction levels, we allow different key users exact definitions of MRI sequences and make them more accessible to ML. We use a vendor-independent MRI framework (gammaSTAR) to build sequences that are formulated by the DSL and export them using the generic file format introduced by the Pulseq framework, making it possible to simulate phantom data using the open-source MR simulation framework JEMRIS to build a training database that relates input MRI sequences to output sets of metrics. Utilizing ML techniques, we learn this correspondence to allow efficient optimization of MRI sequences meeting the clinical demands formulated as a starting point. Results: ML methods are capable of capturing the relation of input and simulated output parameters. Evolutionary algorithms show promising results in finding optimal MRI sequences with regards to the training data. Simulated and acquired MRI data show high correspondence to the initial set of requirements. Discussion: This work has the potential to offer optimal solutions for different clinical scenarios, potentially reducing exam times by preventing suboptimal MRI protocol settings. Future work needs to cover additional DSL layers of higher flexibility as well as an optimization of the underlying MRI simulation process together with an extension of the optimization method.

Indexed as

automationdomain specific languageevolutionary algorithmsmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingoptimizationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID37554629
PMCPMC10406289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.