Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554623›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Utilization of Simulation to Teach Cardiac Auscultation: A Systematic Review.

Harrison A Patrizio, Riley Phyu, Bum Kim, Nils V Brolis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harrison A PatrizioDepartment of Clinical Education and Assessment Center, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, USA.
Riley PhyuDepartment of Clinical Education and Assessment Center, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, USA.
Bum KimDepartment of Clinical Education and Assessment Center, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, USA.
Nils V BrolisDepartment of Simulation, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, evaluates the effectiveness of simulation-based education in teaching cardiac auscultation. A team of researchers conducted a comprehensive, systematic search of the PubMed database from 2010 to 2021, focusing on cardiac auscultation, education, proficiency, and students. After rigorous filtering, a total of 14 articles, primarily involving medical students and residents, met the inclusion criteria. The articles were categorized based on their focus areas: diagnostic accuracy, knowledge acquisition, competency, and learner satisfaction. Findings suggest that the majority of the studies (86% or 12 out of 14) reported positive outcomes of using simulation for teaching cardiac auscultation, demonstrating improvements in the identified focus areas across diverse contexts. The review underscores the need for future research to further standardize simulation teaching practices, aiming to reduce costs, improve usability, and possibly incorporate multiple simulation approaches in a universal educational process. This approach could enhance outcomes across varied fields and learning styles.

Indexed as

cardiac auscultationeducationmedical studentssimulationteaching

Identifiers

PMID37554623
PMCPMC10405975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.