Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554567›Full record

ReviewEuropean clinical respiratory journal2023

Systemic corticosteroids in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis-A systematic review.

Sarah Tamene, Kim Dalhoff, Peter Schwarz, Vibeke Backer, Kasper Aanaes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European clinical respiratory journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07616609 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial of Preoperative Stapokibart With Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07616609 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial of Preoperative Stapokibart With Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tongren HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled48ConditionsChronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)ArmsStapokibart, Matched placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (2024).World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Systemic Corticosteroid Dispensing Patterns Among Patients with Sinonasal Polyps: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah TameneDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kim DalhoffDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter SchwarzDepartment of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Copenhagen.
Vibeke BackerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper AanaesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: When first-line chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) treatment fails, patients can either be treated with oral or injected systemic corticosteroids. Although the EPOS and international guidelines for CRS do not mention injected corticosteroids, it is commonly used by ear, nose, and throat specialists. While the risks of systemic corticosteroids, in general, are known, the pros and cons of injected and oral corticosteroids (OCS) in CRS treatment are unclear. Methods: A systematic review of studies that report the effects and/or side effects of injected and oral corticosteroids in the treatment of CRS was made according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Altogether, 48 studies were included, only five studies reported on injected corticosteroids, and five attended with side effects. Three studies found beneficial effects of OCS perioperatively on sinus surgery, while four articles found no effect. Nineteen articles reported that OCS resulted in an improvement in symptoms. Two articles presented a longer-lasting effect of injected corticosteroids than OCS. Three studies reported adverse side effects of systemic corticosteroids, while two studies showed no adverse side effects. One study showed less adrenal suppression after injected corticosteroids compared to OCS. The evidence is not strong but shows a positive effect of systemic corticosteroids that lasts longer with injections. Conclusion: Although systemic corticosteroids are widely used to treat CRS, there is a lack of studies comparing the OCS and injected corticosteroids. The evidence is sparse, however, injected steroids show longer effects with fewer side effects. An RCT study is needed to compare OCS and injected corticosteroids.

Indexed as

chronic rhinosinusitisinjected corticosteroidsoral corticosteroidsside effectsSystemic corticosteroids

Identifiers

PMID37554567
PMCPMC10405757
OpenAlexW4385579756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.