ArticleiScience2023
Learning to manipulate a whip with simple primitive actions - A simulation study.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of High-Dimensional Coordination in Human Movement Using Variance Spectrum Scaling and Intrinsic Dimensionality.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Time-warping analysis for biological signals: methodology and application.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Human-Inspired Control of a Whip: Preparatory Movements Improve Hitting a Target.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This simulation study investigated whether a 4-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) arm could strike a target with a 50-DOF whip using a motion profile similar to discrete human movements. The interactive dynamics of the multi-joint arm was modeled as a constant joint-space mechanical impedance, with values derived from experimental measurement. Targets at various locations could be hit with a single maximally smooth motion in joint-space coordinates. The arm movements that hit the targets were identified with fewer than 250 iterations. The optimal actions were essentially planar arm motions in extrinsic task-space coordinates, predominantly oriented along the most compliant direction of both task-space and joint-space mechanical impedances. Of the optimal movement parameters, striking a target was most sensitive to movement duration. This result suggests that the elementary actions observed in human motor behavior may support efficient motor control in interaction with a dynamically complex object.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.