Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554434›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2023

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness and Safety of Pharmacopuncture for Chronic Lower Back Pain.

Kyoung Sun Park, Changnyun Kim, Joo Won Kim, Sang-Don Kim, Jee Young Lee, Yoon Jae Lee, Jinho Lee, Min Ji Kim, Young Eun Choi, Changsop Yang and 2 more

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kyoung Sun ParkJaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Changnyun KimDaejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Joo Won KimBucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Don KimHaeundae Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jee Young LeeJaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-1915
Yoon Jae LeeJaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-0942
Jinho LeeJaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Ji KimClinical Research Coordinating Team, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Young Eun ChoiClinical Research Coordinating Team, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Changsop YangClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1277-3329
Chang-Hyun Han *Clinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4285-3063
In-Hyuk Ha *Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5020-6723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic lower back pain (LBP) is a major global health concern. Pharmacopuncture has been widely used to treat LBP in Korea; however, randomized clinical trials (RCT) or active control have not been conducted to evaluate its effectiveness. Therefore, this RCT aimed to compare the effectiveness of pharmacopuncture and physical therapy (PT) for the treatment of chronic LBP. Patients and Methods: A two-arm, parallel, and multicenter RCT was conducted at four hospitals of Korean medicine. Participants with chronic LBP were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio using block randomization to undergo 10 sessions of pharmacopuncture or PT over 5 weeks and followed up for 25 weeks. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analog scale scores of LBP and radiating leg pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI), 5-level EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D-5L), and the patient global impression of change were recorded at baseline and at 6, 13, and 25 weeks. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted as the primary analysis using a linear mixed model. Results: One-hundred patients (mean age, 49.27 years; 58 women) were recruited. At 6 weeks after randomization, pharmacopuncture showed statistically superior results compared with PT in LBP (difference in NRS, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.94-2.13), function (difference in ODI, 4.52%; 95% CI, 0.93-8.11%), and quality of life (difference in EQ-5D-5L) scores (-0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01). This effect persisted for 25 weeks. In the survival analysis for participants with at least a 50% reduction in the NRS scores of LBP during the 182-day follow-up, the pharmacopuncture group showed significantly faster recovery than the PT group (P<0.001, Log rank test). Conclusion: Pharmacopuncture significantly reduced pain and improved functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with low back pain compared with physical therapy. Based on the findings of this study, pharmacopuncture could be recommended as a treatment for patients with chronic low back pain.

Indexed as

low back painOswestry disability indexpharmacopuncturephysiotherapypragmatic randomized controlled trialRoland–Morris disability questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID37554434
PMCPMC10406108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.