Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554411›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Better together: novel methods for measuring and modeling development of executive function diversity while accounting for unity.

Jessica Wise Younger, Kristine D O'Laughlin, Joaquin A Anguera, Silvia A Bunge, Emilio E Ferrer, Fumiko Hoeft, Bruce D McCandliss, Jyoti Mishra, Miriam Rosenberg-Lee, Adam Gazzaley and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Remote group intervention for adults with cancer-related cognitive impairment: a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica Wise YoungerNeuroscape, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kristine D O'LaughlinNeuroscape, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Joaquin A AngueraNeuroscape, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Silvia A BungeDepartment of Psychology & Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Emilio E FerrerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Fumiko HoeftDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Bruce D McCandlissGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Jyoti MishraDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Miriam Rosenberg-LeeDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.
Adam GazzaleyNeuroscape, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Melina R UncapherNeuroscape, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Executive functions (EFs) are linked to positive outcomes across the lifespan. Yet, methodological challenges have prevented precise understanding of the developmental trajectory of their organization. Methods: We introduce novel methods to address challenges for both measuring and modeling EFs using an accelerated longitudinal design with a large, diverse sample of students in middle childhood ( Results and discussion: Using this methodological paradigm shift brought new precision and clarity to the development of these EFs, showing these eight tasks are organized into three stable components by age 10, but refinement of composition of these components continues through at least age 14.

Indexed as

digital assessmentexecutive functionin-school assessmentmiddle childhoodnetwork modeling

Identifiers

PMID37554411
PMCPMC10405287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.