ArticleCurrent research in physiology2023
Assessing uterine electrophysiology prior to elective term induction of labor.
Article in Current research in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if uterine electrophysiological signals gathered from 151 non-invasive biomagnetic sensors spread over the abdomen were associated with successful induction of labor (IOL). Study design: Uterine magnetomyogram (MMG) signals were collected using the SARA (SQUID Array for Reproductive Assessment) device from 33 subjects between 37 and 42 weeks gestational age. The signals were post-processed, uterine contractile related MMG bursts were detected, and parameters in the time and frequency domain were extracted. The modified Bishop score calculated at admission was used to determine the method of IOL. Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used to compare IOL successes and failures for differences in gestational age (GA), parity, modified Bishop's score, maximum oxytocin, and electrophysiological parameters extracted from MMG. Results: The average parity was three times (3x) higher (1.53 versus 0.50; p = 0.039), and the average modified Bishop score was 2x higher (3.32 versus 1.63; p = 0.032) amongst IOL successes than failures, while the average GA and maximum oxytocin showed a small difference. For the MMG parameters, successful IOLs had, on average, 3.5x greater mean power during bursts (0.246 versus 0.070; p = 0.034) and approximately 1.2x greater mean number of bursts (2.05 versus 1.68; p = 0.036) compared to the failed IOLs, but non-significant differences were observed in mean peak frequency, mean burst duration, and mean duration between bursts. Conclusion: The study showed that inductions of labor that took less than 24 h to deliver have a higher mean power in the baseline electrophysiological activity of the uterus when recorded prior to planned induction. The results are indicative that baseline electrophysiological activity measured prior to induction is associated with successful induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.