Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554349›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Assessment of prenatal depression among U.S. pregnant women without access to paid sick leave and regular place of care: National Health Interview Survey of U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born.

Saanie Sulley, David Adzrago, Lohuwa Mamudu, Emmanuel A Odame, Paul H Atandoh, Ishmael Tagoe, David Ruggieri, Lisa Kahle, Faustine Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Environmental Stressors, Anemia, and Depressive Symptoms in Pregnancy: Unpacking the Combined Risks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saanie SulleyNational Healthy Start Association, Washington, DC, USA.
David AdzragoDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lohuwa MamuduDepartment of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Emmanuel A OdameDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Paul H AtandohDepartment of Statistics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Ishmael TagoeDivision of Health Services, College of Nursing and Advanced Health Professions, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA.
David RuggieriInformation Management Services, Inc., Calverton, MD, USA.
Lisa KahleInformation Management Services, Inc., Calverton, MD, USA.
Faustine WilliamsDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Understanding Population Mental Health to Promote and Improve Mental Well-Being ZIAMD000015 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI WILLIAMS, FAUSTINE · 2020 to 2025
$2.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal depression is one of the most common risks during pregnancy. This study examined the prevalence and likelihood of prenatal depression association with sociodemographic factors, paid sick leave, and place of care among U.S. pregnant women. We conducted bivariate Chi-square tests to assess the statistical difference and multivariable logistic regression models to assess the association of prenatal depression using the National Health Interview Survey, cross-sectional data from 2010 to 2019 of pregnant women aged 18-44 years (N = 957). The prevalence of prenatal depression was 40.6%, 28.5%, and 27.2% among White, Black, and other racial pregnant women, respectively. Pregnant women with no regular/routine place of care had a prenatal depression prevalence rate of 58.1%, and those without access to paid sick leave had 46.9%. Also, pregnant women without access to paid sick leave were found to have an increased likelihood of reporting prenatal depression ([adjusted odds ratio] AOR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.72-3.64), as well as those without a regular place of care (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.32-4.47). The findings identify factors that need to be addressed to minimize depression among U.S. pregnant women and establish the need for tailored interventions to address prenatal depression.

Indexed as

Non-U.S.-bornPaid sick leavePlace of carePrenatal depressionU.S.-born

Identifiers

PMID37554349
PMCPMC10404555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.