Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554335›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Resultant equations for training load monitoring during a standard microcycle in sub-elite youth football: a principal components approach.

José Eduardo Teixeira, Pedro Forte, Ricardo Ferraz, Luís Branquinho, Ryland Morgans, António José Silva, António Miguel Monteiro, Tiago M Barbosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

José Eduardo TeixeiraResearch Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4612-3623
Pedro ForteResearch Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.
Ricardo FerrazResearch Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.
Luís BranquinhoResearch Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-5419
Ryland MorgansInstitute for Coaching and Performance, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
António José SilvaResearch Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.
António Miguel MonteiroResearch Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4467-1722
Tiago M BarbosaResearch Centre in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-2116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applying data-reduction techniques to extract meaningful information from electronic performance and tracking systems (EPTS) has become a hot topic in football training load (TL) monitoring. The aim of this study was to reduce the dimensionality of the internal and external load measures, by a principal component approach, to describe and explain the resultant equations for TL monitoring during a standard in-season microcycle in sub-elite youth football. Additionally, it is intended to identify the most representative measure for each principal component. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted with a Monte Carlo parallel analysis and VariMax rotation to extract baseline characteristics, external TL, heart rate (HR)-based measures and perceived exertion. Training data were collected from sixty sub-elite young football players during a 6-week training period using 18 Hz global positioning system (GPS) with inertial sensors, 1 Hz short-range telemetry system, total quality recovery (TQR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Five principal components accounted for 68.7% of the total variance explained in the training data. Resultant equations from PCA was subdivided into: (1) explosiveness, accelerations and impacts (27.4%); (2) high-speed running (16.2%); (3) HR-based measures (10.0%); (4) baseline characteristics (8.3%); and (5) average running velocity (6.7%). Considering the highest factor in each principal component, decelerations (PCA 1), sprint distance (PCA 2), average HR (PCA 3), chronological age (PCA 4) and maximal speed (PCA 5) are the conditional dimension to be considered in TL monitoring during a standard microcycle in sub-elite youth football players. Current research provides the first composite equations to extract the most representative components during a standard in-season microcycle in sub-elite youth football players. Futures research should expand the resultant equations within training days, by considering other well-being measures, technical-tactical skills and match-related contextual factors.

Indexed as

FootballRunningAccelerationAdolescentGeographic Information SystemsHumansGlobal positioning systemPCASoccerWorkloadYouth

Identifiers

PMID37554335
PMCPMC10405799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.