ArticleBelitung nursing journal2022
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy on chronic wound healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Integrating Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in the Therapeutic Protocol of Extensive Pediatric Burns: Current Practice and Further Treatment Decision Algorithm.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The use of Pretiva™ negative pressure therapy provides benefits in the management of hard-to-heal chronic wounds: A case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Systematic Literature Review Into Negative-pressure Wound Therapy in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- A review on wound management strategies in enhanced recovery after craniotomy: An in-depth analysis of their influence on patient recovery and surgical outcomes.International wound journal · 2024Review
- Patient and wound factors associated with WOUND-Q scales measuring health-related quality of life: An international cross-sectional study.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is considered an effective treatment in facilitating the healing of chronic wounds. However, its effect remains inconsistent, which allows for further investigation. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the NPWT program in improving the management of chronic wound healing. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis was used. Data Sources: The search strategy ranged from 2016 to 2021 in PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. Review Methods: Risk of bias was done based on the Risk of Bias 2.0 guideline using RevMan 5.4.1, and meta-analysis was done using Jeffreys's Amazing Statistics Program Results: A total of 15 articles were included, with 3,599 patients with chronic wounds. There was no publication bias in this study seen from the results of the Egger's test value of 0.447 ( Conclusion: The analysis results show that the standard low pressure of 80-125 mmHg could improve microcirculation and accelerate the healing process of chronic wounds. Therefore, applying the NPWT program could be an alternative to nursing interventions. However, it should be carried out by competent wound nurses who carry out procedure steps, implement general patient care, and give tips on overcoming device problems and evaluation. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022348457.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.