Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37554096›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2024

Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Johanna Melin, Maria Forslund, Simon Alesi, Terhi Piltonen, Daniela Romualdi, Poli Mara Spritzer, Chau Thien Tay, Alexia Pena, Selma Feldman Witchel, Aya Mousa and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Johanna MelinMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3561-7097
Maria ForslundMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-3849
Simon AlesiMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-622X
Terhi PiltonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine and Medical Research Centre Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-7300
Daniela RomualdiDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5236-2586
Poli Mara SpritzerGynecological Endocrinology Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 90035-003, Brazil.
Chau Thien TayMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Alexia PenaDiscipline of Paediatrics, The University of Adelaide and Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
Selma Feldman WitchelDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Helena TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Monash University · AUAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USMonash Health · AUOulu University Hospital · FIThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Hjalmar Svensson FoundationIris foundationNational Health and Medical Research CouncilOrion Research foundationThe Medical Society of Finland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects more than 1 in 10 women.

objectiveAs part of the 2023 International PCOS Guidelines update, comparisons between combined oral contraceptive pills (COCP), metformin, and combination treatment were evaluated. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, All EBM, and CINAHL were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Women with PCOS included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA EXTRACTION: We calculated mean differences and 95% CIs regarding anthropometrics, metabolic, and hyperandrogenic outcomes. Meta-analyses and quality assessment using GRADE were performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search identified 1660 publications; 36 RCTs were included. For hirsutism, no differences were seen when comparing metformin vs COCP, nor when comparing COCP vs combination treatment with metformin and COCP. Metformin was inferior on free androgen index (FAI) (7.08; 95% CI 4.81, 9.36), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (-118.61 nmol/L; 95% CI -174.46, -62.75) and testosterone (0.48 nmol/L; 95% CI 0.32, 0.64) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for FAI (0.58; 95% CI 0.36, 0.80) and SHBG (-16.61 nmol/L; 95% CI -28.51, -4.71) compared with combination treatment, whereas testosterone did not differ. Metformin lowered insulin (-27.12 pmol/L; 95% CI -40.65, -13.59) and triglycerides (-0.15 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.29, -0.01) compared with COCP. COCP was inferior for insulin (17.03 pmol/L; 95% CI 7.79, 26.26) and insulin resistance (0.44; 95% CI 0.17, 0.70) compared with combination treatment.

conclusionsThe choice of metformin or COCP treatment should be based on symptoms, noting some biochemical benefits from combination treatment targeting both major endocrine disturbances seen in PCOS (hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism).

Indexed as

InsulinsMetforminPolycystic Ovary SyndromeContraceptives, Oral, CombinedFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsTestosteroneContraceptives, Oral, CombinedHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinsMetforminTestosteronecombined oral contraceptive pillhirsutismmeta-analysismetforminpolycystic ovary syndromeweight

Identifiers

PMID37554096
PMCPMC10795934
OpenAlexW4385679942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.