Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553990›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2023

Sheet and void porous media models for brain interstitial space.

Charles Nicholson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Sheet and void porous media models for brain interstitial space.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Charles NicholsonDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7346-0484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interstitial space (ISS) component of brain extracellular space resembles an unconsolidated porous medium. Previous analysis of the diffusion of small molecules in this domain shows that the typical porosity is 0.2 and typical tortuosity 1.6. An ensemble of cubic cells separated by uniform sheets of ISS cannot generate the measured tortuosity, even if some of the tortuosity value is attributed to interstitial viscosity, so more complex models are needed. Here two models are analysed: the corner cubic void (CCV) and the edge tunnel void (ETV). Both models incorporate dead spaces formed from local expansions of the ISS to increase geometrical tortuosity. Using Monte Carlo simulation of diffusion it is found that in the range of normal porosities, the square of the tortuosity is a linear function of the ratio of void to sheet volumes for the CCV model and this model can generate the experimentally observed tortuosities. For abnormally high porosities, however, the linear relation fails. The ETV model shows a quartic functional relation and can only generate the observed tortuosity if interstitial viscosity is present. The CCV model is used to analyse the recently described changes in porosity between asleep and awake brain states.

Indexed as

BrainExtracellular SpaceComputer SimulationDiffusionPorositybrain extracellular spacedead spacediffusionporositysleeptortuosity

Identifiers

PMID37553990
PMCPMC10410222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.