Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553834›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2024

Comparative phylogenomics and phylotranscriptomics provide insights into the genetic complexity of nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbiosis.

Yu Zhang, Yuan Fu, Wenfei Xian, Xiuli Li, Yong Feng, Fengjiao Bu, Yan Shi, Shiyu Chen, Robin van Velzen, Kai Battenberg and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The symbiosome-a transient organelle in evolution.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Yu ZhangShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Yuan FuShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China; State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Wenfei XianShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Xiuli LiShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Yong FengShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Fengjiao BuShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Yan ShiShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Shiyu ChenShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Robin van VelzenBiosystematics Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6708PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Kai BattenbergDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Alison M BerryDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Marco G SalgadoDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Hui LiuGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, China.
Tingshuang YiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, China.
Pascale FournierUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, INRA, UMR 1418, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Nicole AlloisioUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, INRA, UMR 1418, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Petar PujicUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, INRA, UMR 1418, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Hasna BoubakriUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, INRA, UMR 1418, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
M Eric SchranzBiosystematics Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6708PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Pierre-Marc DelauxLaboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales (LRSV), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, 24 chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville, BP42617, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Gane Ka-Shu WongDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
Valerie HocherFrench National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), UMR LSTM (IRD/CIRAD/INRAe/Montpellier University/Supagro)- Campus International Baillarguet, TA A-82/J, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Sergio SvistoonoffFrench National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), UMR LSTM (IRD/CIRAD/INRAe/Montpellier University/Supagro)- Campus International Baillarguet, TA A-82/J, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Hassen GherbiFrench National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), UMR LSTM (IRD/CIRAD/INRAe/Montpellier University/Supagro)- Campus International Baillarguet, TA A-82/J, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Ertao WangNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, SIBS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Wouter KohlenLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6708PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Luis G WallLaboratory of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Soil Biological Interactions, Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, CONICET, Bernal, Argentina.
Martin ParniskeFaculty of Biology, Genetics, LMU Munich, Großhaderner Strasse 2-4, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Katharina PawlowskiDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Philippe NormandUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, INRA, UMR 1418, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Jeffrey J DoyleSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Sections of Plant Biology and Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: jjd5@cornell.edu.
Shifeng ChengShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China. Electronic address: chengshifeng@caas.cn.
Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRCentre for BioSystems Genomics · NLChinese Academy of Sciences · CNKunming Institute of Botany · CNNational University of Quilmes · ARStockholm University · SEUniversity of California, Davis · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCornell University · USGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NLUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant root-nodule symbiosis (RNS) with mutualistic nitrogen-fixing bacteria is restricted to a single clade of angiosperms, the Nitrogen-Fixing Nodulation Clade (NFNC), and is best understood in the legume family. Nodulating species share many commonalities, explained either by divergence from a common ancestor over 100 million years ago or by convergence following independent origins over that same time period. Regardless, comparative analyses of diverse nodulation syndromes can provide insights into constraints on nodulation-what must be acquired or cannot be lost for a functional symbiosis-and the latitude for variation in the symbiosis. However, much remains to be learned about nodulation, especially outside of legumes. Here, we employed a large-scale phylogenomic analysis across 88 species, complemented by 151 RNA-seq libraries, to elucidate the evolution of RNS. Our phylogenomic analyses further emphasize the uniqueness of the transcription factor NIN as a master regulator of nodulation and identify key mutations that affect its function across the NFNC. Comparative transcriptomic assessment revealed nodule-specific upregulated genes across diverse nodulating plants, while also identifying nodule-specific and nitrogen-response genes. Approximately 70% of symbiosis-related genes are highly conserved in the four representative species, whereas defense-related and host-range restriction genes tend to be lineage specific. Our study also identified over 900 000 conserved non-coding elements (CNEs), over 300 000 of which are unique to sampled NFNC species. NFNC-specific CNEs are enriched with the active H3K9ac mark and are correlated with accessible chromatin regions, thus representing a pool of candidate regulatory elements for genes involved in RNS. Collectively, our results provide novel insights into the evolution of nodulation and lay a foundation for engineering of RNS traits in agriculturally important crops.

Indexed as

FabaceaeSymbiosisNitrogenPhylogenyRoot Nodules, PlantNitrogenconserved non-coding elementsconvergencedeep homologynitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbiosisphylogenomicsphylotranscriptomicstwo competing hypotheses

Identifiers

PMID37553834
PMCPMC10811378
OpenAlexW4385660359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.