ArticleGenome biology2023
Reconstruction of the last bacterial common ancestor from 183 pangenomes reveals a versatile ancient core genome.
Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- SAASI: Sampling Aware Ancestral State Inference.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cell cycle dysregulation of globally important SAR11 bacteria resulting from environmental perturbation.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Exploring glycolytic enzymes in disease: potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in neurodegeneration, cancer and parasitic infections.Open biology · 2025Review
- Delving into the lifestyle of Sundarban Wetland resident, biofilm producing, halotolerant Salinicoccus roseus: a comparative genomics-based intervention.BMC genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCumulative sequencing efforts have yielded enough genomes to construct pangenomes for dozens of bacterial species and elucidate intraspecies gene conservation. Given the diversity of organisms for which this is achievable, similar analyses for ancestral species are feasible through the integration of pangenomics and phylogenetics, promising deeper insights into the nature of ancient life.
resultsWe construct pangenomes for 183 bacterial species from 54,085 genomes and identify their core genomes using a novel statistical model to estimate genome-specific error rates and underlying gene frequencies. The core genomes are then integrated into a phylogenetic tree to reconstruct the core genome of the last bacterial common ancestor (LBCA), yielding three main results: First, the gene content of modern and ancestral core genomes are diverse at the level of individual genes but are similarly distributed by functional category and share several poorly characterized genes. Second, the LBCA core genome is distinct from any individual modern core genome but has many fundamental biological systems intact, especially those involving translation machinery and biosynthetic pathways to all major nucleotides and amino acids. Third, despite this metabolic versatility, the LBCA core genome likely requires additional non-core genes for viability, based on comparisons with the minimal organism, JCVI-Syn3A.
conclusionsThese results suggest that many cellular systems commonly conserved in modern bacteria were not just present in ancient bacteria but were nearly immutable with respect to short-term intraspecies variation. Extending this analysis to other domains of life will likely provide similar insights into more distant ancestral species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.