Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553581›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2023

Early neurological and motor function in infants born moderate to late preterm or small for gestational age at term: a prospective cohort study.

Henriette Paulsen, Ulf Wike Ljungblad, Kirsti Riiser, Kari Anne I Evensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Preventive early intervention strategies for neurodevelopmental disorders of high-risk infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Henriette PaulsenDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Post box 1068, Tønsberg, NO-3103, Norway. hepaul@siv.no.
Ulf Wike LjungbladDepartment of Pediatrics, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Kirsti RiiserDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Kari Anne I EvensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOMetropolitan University · BDSykehuset i Vestfold · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are inconsistent findings regarding neurological and motor development in infants born moderate to late preterm and infants born small for gestational age at term. The primary aim of this study was to compare neurological and motor function between preterm, term SGA and term AGA infants aged three to seven months corrected age using several common assessment tools. The secondary aim was to investigate their motor function at two years.

methodsIn this prospective cohort study, we included 43 infants born moderate to late preterm with gestational age 32-36 + 6 weeks, 39 infants born small for gestational age (SGA) at term with a birthweight ≤ 10th centile for gestational age, and 170 infants born at term with appropriate weight for gestational age (AGA). Neurological and motor function were assessed once in infancy between three to seven months corrected age by using four standardised assessment tools: Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE), Test of Infant Motor Performance, General Movements Assessment and Alberta Infant Motor Scale. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-2) was used at two years.

resultsAt three to seven months corrected age, mean age-corrected HINE scores were 61.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 60.5 to 63.1) in the preterm group compared with 63.3 (95% CI: 62.6 to 63.9) in the term AGA group. Preterm infants had 5.8 (95% CI: 2.4 to 15.4) higher odds for HINE scores < 10th percentile. The other test scores did not differ between the groups. At two years, the preterm group had 17 (95% CI: 1.9 to 160) higher odds for gross motor scores below cut-off on ASQ-2 compared with the term AGA group.

conclusionsThe present study found subtle differences in neurological function between preterm and term AGA infants in infancy. At two years, preterm children had poorer gross motor function. The findings indicate that moderate prematurity in otherwise healthy infants pose a risk for neurological deficits not only during the first year, but also at two years of age when compared with term AGA children.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInfant, Small for Gestational AgeBirth WeightChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProspective StudiesAssessment toolsLow-risk infantsMotor functionNeurological functionPretermSmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID37553581
PMCPMC10408141
OpenAlexW4385663080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.