ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
The impact of an ultrasound atlas for scoring salivary glands in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a pilot study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Major Salivary Gland MRI in Adult Sjögren's Disease: Protocols, Findings, and Clinical Utility.Cureus · 2026Review
- Lacrimal gland ultrasonography as an adjunct tool for Sjögren disease (SjD) diagnosis from undifferentiated connective tissue diseases.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Usefulness of salivary gland ultrasonography in Sjögren's syndrome: The Tunisian Experience.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Agreement between glandular ultrasonography and histopathology of minor salivary glands in adults with sicca syndrome.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- The diagnostic value and clinical relevance of salivary gland ultrasound in patients with highly suspected Sjögren's Disease: a prospective monocentric study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this pilot study was to assess the impact of a salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) atlas for scoring parenchymal changes in Sjögren's syndrome by assessing the reliability of the scoring system (0-3), without and with the use of the SGUS atlas. Ten participants with varying experience in SGUS contributed to the reliability exercise. Thirty SGUS images of the submandibular and parotid gland with abnormalities ranging from 0 to 3 were scored using the written definitions of the OMERACT SGUS scoring system and using the SGUS atlas based on the OMERACT scoring system. For intra-reader reliability, two rounds were performed without and with the atlas-in the 2nd round the 30 images were rearranged in random order by a physician not included in the scoring. Inter-reader reliability was also determined in both rounds. Without using the atlas, the SGUS OMERACT scoring system showed fair inter-reader reliability in round 1 (mean kappa 0.36; range 0.06-0.69) and moderate intra-reader reliability (mean kappa 0.55; range 0.28-0.81). With the atlas, inter-reader reliability improved in round 1 to moderate (mean kappa 0.52; range 0.31-0.77) and intra-reader reliability to good (mean kappa 0.69; range 0.46-0.86). Higher intra-reader reliability was noted in participants with previous SGUS experience. The SGUS atlas increased both intra- and inter-reader reliability for scoring gland pathology in participants with varying SGUS experience suggesting a possible future role in clinical practice and trials. Key Points • Ultrasonography can detect parenchymal changes in salivary glands in patients with Sjögren's disease. • An ultrasound atlas may improve reliability of scoring parenchymal changes in salivary glands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.