Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553543›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2023

AI-predicted mpMRI image features for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Song Li, Ke-Xin Wang, Jia-Lei Li, Yi He, Xiao-Ying Wang, Wen-Rui Tang, Wen-Hua Xie, Wei Zhu, Peng-Sheng Wu, Xiang-Peng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Song Li *Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Ke-Xin Wang *School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia-Lei Li *Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Yi HeThe Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China. 84748480@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-2737
Xiao-Ying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China. cjr.wangxiaoying@vip.163.com.
Wen-Rui TangThe Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Wen-Hua XieThe Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Wei ZhuThe Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Peng-Sheng WuBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xiang-Peng WangBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.

Funding

Capital Medical University Beijing 2020-2-40710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility of using mpMRI image features predicted by AI algorithms in the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study analyzed patients who underwent prostate mpMRI and radical prostatectomy (RP) at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University between November 2017 and December 2022. The clinical data collected included age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and biopsy pathology. The reference standard was the prostatectomy pathology, and a Gleason Score (GS) of 3 + 3 = 6 was considered non-clinically significant prostate cancer (non-csPCa), while a GS ≥ 3 + 4 was considered csPCa. A pre-trained AI algorithm was used to extract the lesion on mpMRI, and the image features of the lesion and the prostate gland were analyzed. Two logistic regression models were developed to predict csPCa: an MR model and a combined model. The MR model used age, PSA, PSA density (PSAD), and the AI-predicted MR image features as predictor variables. The combined model used biopsy pathology and the aforementioned variables as predictor variables. The model's effectiveness was evaluated by comparing it to biopsy pathology using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operation characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsA total of 315 eligible patients were enrolled with an average age of 70.8 ± 5.9. Based on RP pathology, 18 had non-csPCa, and 297 had csPCa. PSA, PSAD, biopsy pathology, and ADC value of the prostate outside the lesion (ADC

conclusionThe aggressiveness of prostate cancer can be effectively predicted using AI-extracted image features from mpMRI images, similar to biopsy pathology. The prediction accuracy was improved by combining the AI-extracted mpMRI image features with biopsy pathology, surpassing the performance of biopsy pathology alone.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesDeep learningGleason scoreInternational Society of Urological Pathology grade groupMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID37553543
PMCPMC10560153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.