Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553488›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2023

What predicts durable symptom relief of uterine fibroids treated with MRI-guided focused ultrasound? A multicenter trial in 8 academic centers.

Rachel R Bitton, Angela Fast, Kim-Nhien Vu, Deirdre A Lum, Bertha Chen, Gina K Hesley, Steven S Raman, Alan H Matsumoto, Thomas M Price, Clare Tempany and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01285960 (A Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety of the ExAblate Model 2100 Type 1.1 System), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01285960 nacompletednot on this map

A Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety of the ExAblate Model 2100 Type 1.1 System (ExAblate 2100/2000 UF V2 System) in the Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids

TypeinterventionalSponsorInSightecRan2012 to 2016Enrolled108ConditionsUterine FibroidsArmsExAblate Treatment UF V2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel R BittonDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 1024 Welch Road, MC 5488, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. rbitton@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2824-8978
Angela FastDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 1024 Welch Road, MC 5488, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Kim-Nhien VuDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 1024 Welch Road, MC 5488, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Deirdre A LumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Bertha ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Gina K HesleyDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Steven S RamanInterventional Radiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alan H MatsumotoInterventional Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Thomas M PriceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Clare TempanyDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Neha DhawanInsightec, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA.
Eric DolenOhio Health, Columbus, OH, USA.
Maureen KohiVascular and Interventional Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Fiona M FennesseyDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Pejman GhanouniDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 1024 Welch Road, MC 5488, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOhioHealth · USStanford Medicine · USStrategic Insight (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify variables predictive of durable clinical success after MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatment of uterine fibroids. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective, multicenter trial, 99 women with symptomatic uterine fibroids were treated using MRgFUS. Pelvic MRI was obtained at baseline and treatment day. The Uterine Fibroid Symptom-Quality of Life questionnaire was used to calculate a symptom severity score (SSS) at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment. Clinical, imaging, and treatment variables were correlated with symptom reduction sustained through the 12- and 24-month time points using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A novel parameter, the ratio of non-perfused volume to total fibroid load (NPV/TFL), was developed to determine association with durable outcomes.

resultsPost-treatment, mean symptom severity decreased at the 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-ups (p < 0.001, all time points). In univariable analysis, three variables predicted treatment success (defined by ≥ 30-point improvement in SSS) sustained at both the 12-month and 24-month time points: increasing ratio of NPV/TFL (p = 0.002), decreasing total fibroid load (p = 0.04), and the absence of T2-weighted Funaki type 2 fibroids (p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, the NPV/TFL was the sole predictor of durable clinical success (p = 0.01). Patients with ratios below 30% had less improvement in SSS and lacked durable clinical response compared with those between 30-79 (p = 0.03) and ≥ 80% (p = 0.01).

conclusionIncreased non-perfused volume relative to total fibroid volume was significantly associated with durable reduction of symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding and bulk bother. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Patient selection for sustained clinical benefit should emphasize those with likelihood of achieving high ablation ratios, as determined by imaging (e.g., device access, Funaki type) and by considering the total fibroid load, not just the primary symptomatic fibroid.

trial registrationClinical trial ID: NCT01285960. KEY POINTS: • Patient selection/treatment approach associated with durable symptom relief in MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids remains unclear. • The ablation ratio, non-perfused volume/total fibroid volume, was positively associated with sustained symptom relief in both bleeding and bulk bother at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. • Selecting patients with imaging features that favor a high ratio of ablation to total fibroid load (including non-targeted fibroids) is the main factor in predicting durability of symptom relief after uterine fibroid treatment.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationLeiomyomaUterine NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAblationLeiomyomaMRI-guided focused ultrasoundUterine fibroid

Identifiers

PMID37553488
OpenAlexW4385684895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.