ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023
The molecular diagnostic yield of frame-based stereotactic biopsies in the age of precision neuro-oncology: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hetairos is a histology-based artificial intelligence model for predicting central nervous system tumor methylation subtypes.Nature cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of Navigated and Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy-A Single-Center Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWith the increasing role of molecular genetics in the diagnostics of intracranial tumors, delivering sufficient representative tissue for such analyses is of paramount importance. This study explored the rate of successful diagnosis after frame-based stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions.
methodsConsecutive patients undergoing frame-based stereotactic biopsies in 2020 and 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Cases were classified into three groups: conclusive, diagnosis with missing molecular genetics (MG) data, and inconclusive neuropathological diagnosis.
resultsOf 145 patients, a conclusive diagnosis was possible in n = 137 cases (94.5%). For 3 cases (2.0%), diagnosis was established with missing MG data. In 5 cases (3.5%), an inconclusive (tumor) diagnosis was met. Diagnoses comprised mainly WHO 4 glioblastomas (n = 73, 56%), CNS lymphomas (n = 23, 16%), inflammatory diseases (n = 14, 10%), and metastases (n = 5, 3%). Methylomics were applied in 49% (n = 44) of tumor cases (panel sequencing in n = 28, 30% of tumors). The average number of specimens used for MG diagnostics was 5, while the average number of specimens provided was 15. In a univariate analysis, insufficient DNA was associated with an inconclusive diagnosis or a diagnosis with missing MG data (p < 0.001). Analyses of planned and implemented trajectories of cases with diagnosis with missing MG data or inconclusive diagnosis (n = 8) revealed that regions of interest were reached in almost all cases (n = 7).
conclusionAlthough stereotactic frame-based biopsies deliver a limited amount of tissue, they bear high histopathological and molecular genetic diagnostic yields. Given the proven surgical precision of the planned biopsy trajectories, optimizing surveyed lesion regions could help improve the rate of conclusive diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.