Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37553424›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Osteoporosis screening using machine learning and electromagnetic waves.

Gabriela A Albuquerque, Dionísio D A Carvalho, Agnaldo S Cruz, João P Q Santos, Guilherme M Machado, Ignácio S Gendriz, Felipe R S Fernandes, Ingridy M P Barbalho, Marquiony M Santos, César A D Teixeira and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriela A AlbuquerqueLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil. gabriela.albuquerque@navi.ifrn.edu.br.
Dionísio D A CarvalhoLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Agnaldo S CruzLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
João P Q SantosAdvanced Nucleus of Technological Innovation (NAVI), Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Guilherme M MachadoLyRIDS, ECE-Engineering School, Paris, France.
Ignácio S GendrizLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Felipe R S FernandesLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Ingridy M P BarbalhoLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Marquiony M SantosLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
César A D TeixeiraDepartment of Informatics Engineering, Univ. Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra (CISUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Jorge M O HenriquesDepartment of Informatics Engineering, Univ. Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra (CISUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Paulo GilDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Science and Technology, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Adrião D D NetoPost-Graduation Program on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Antonio L P S CamposPost-Graduation Program on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Josivan G LimaUniversity Hospital Onofre Lopes, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Jailton C PaivaAdvanced Nucleus of Technological Innovation (NAVI), Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Antonio H F MoraisAdvanced Nucleus of Technological Innovation (NAVI), Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Thaisa Santos LimaLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Ricardo A M ValentimLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health (LAIS), Natal, RN, Brazil.
Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversity of Coimbra · PTHospital Universitário Onofre Lopes · BRMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by impairment of bone microarchitecture that causes high socioeconomic impacts in the world because of fractures and hospitalizations. Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing the disease, access to DXA in developing countries is still limited due to its high cost, being present only in specialized hospitals. In this paper, we analyze the performance of Osseus, a low-cost portable device based on electromagnetic waves that measures the attenuation of the signal that crosses the medial phalanx of a patient's middle finger and was developed for osteoporosis screening. The analysis is carried out by predicting changes in bone mineral density using Osseus measurements and additional common risk factors used as input features to a set of supervised classification models, while the results from DXA are taken as target (real) values during the training of the machine learning algorithms. The dataset consisted of 505 patients who underwent osteoporosis screening with both devices (DXA and Osseus), of whom 21.8% were healthy and 78.2% had low bone mineral density or osteoporosis. A cross-validation with k-fold = 5 was considered in model training, while 20% of the whole dataset was used for testing. The obtained performance of the best model (Random Forest) presented a sensitivity of 0.853, a specificity of 0.879, and an F1 of 0.859. Since the Random Forest (RF) algorithm allows some interpretability of its results (through the impurity check), we were able to identify the most important variables in the classification of osteoporosis. The results showed that the most important variables were age, body mass index, and the signal attenuation provided by Osseus. The RF model, when used together with Osseus measurements, is effective in screening patients and facilitates the early diagnosis of osteoporosis. The main advantages of such early screening are the reduction of costs associated with exams, surgeries, treatments, and hospitalizations, as well as improved quality of life for patients.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisQuality of LifeAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityElectromagnetic RadiationHumansMachine LearningMass ScreeningMineralsMineralsOsseus

Identifiers

PMID37553424
PMCPMC10409756
OpenAlexW4385665444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.