ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Comparison of cataract surgery outcomes between a secondary and a tertiary eye hospital in Tamil Nadu, India.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Cataract Surgery Workflows Across a Multi-Satellite Tertiary Care Center.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Improving the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery.Community eye health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the difference in post-operative visual outcomes of cataract surgeries between a tertiary and secondary centre at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Tamil Nadu, India.
methodsOur retrospective cross-sectional study analysed cataract surgeries at a secondary centre and its associated tertiary centre in 2021. Our main outcome measures were postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Two-sample proportion tests and logistic regression analyses were performed.
resultsThe analysis of 32,302 cataract surgeries in 2021 of which 4357 were performed at the secondary centre and 27,945 were performed at the tertiary centre showed that the tertiary centre operated on more advanced cataract condition (p < 0.001). Intraoperative (p < 0.001) and post-operative complication rates (p < 0.001) were higher in the tertiary centre. The odds of effective outcomes (BCVA > = 6/12) controlling for all covariates are poorer (p < 0.0001) in the tertiary centre for both phacoemulsification (phaco) and manual small incision cataract surgeries (MSICS).
conclusionWorld Health Organization recommendations for the effective outcome of cataract surgery are met by both the tertiary and secondary centres, but the odds of effective outcomes in the tertiary centre was lower after adjusting for all known factors. Further investigations of the causes of poor vision in both phaco and MSICS in the tertiary centre are needed to improve the situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.